The picture is blurry and there’s no scale to tell how far out the object is, and indeed whether it is a wave or a creature or something else. All the way around it’s too inconclusive to say that it is or isn’t something, because there’s not enough facts to narrow down the field.

Now, if you believe the witness, then we’ve got a creature because it was observed moving and following a shoal of fish. And it doesn’t sound like a standard seal, sea cow, whale, etc. with the elongated head and neck.

However, in this day and age, you cannot take any witness at face value, and certainly not a single person. And the photo is just suggestive enough to let the imagination fill in the gaps.

Give me another half dozen people who happened to see this thing, all of whom have no tie to one another, with similar descriptions, maybe even another photo, and some info to draw on, and then we have ourselves something to consider and get excited about.

“Nothing, just a wave”

“Just a log in the water”

Yes, it could be. But just dismissing it and dusting your hands of it is the wrong thing to do.

A few questions I would ask would be, was she standing on the beach or was she in a boat? Being in a boat and having your camera zoomed in, of course the picture is going to turn out blurry.

If the thing–whatever it was–was moving farther out, it couldn’t have been a wave.

She said it was following a shoal of fish. I had never heard that before, but apparently it’s a mixed group of different species of fish. So, obviously she saw the fish, and claims this thing was following them. If they were moving, wouldn’t it make sense that they were evading a predator?

Just throwing those things out there. Just makes me mad whenever there’s a sighting of something, and we get either a picture or a video, people always say “Log” or “Wave”. We’ll never find or discover a “sea monster” if all people ever do is dismiss the sightings.