Comments on: Crypto-Cat-Fight Continues

By: fuzzy

fuzzy — Thu, 11 May 2006 14:59:55 +0000

Abominable!

By: aaha

aaha — Thu, 11 May 2006 14:57:22 +0000

“They” have begun to closely monitor and round up the “eco-terrorists”, declaring them to be a public enemy and nuisance. Will “they” subsequently classify the fanatical militant (and armed) “bigfoot researchers” sitting out there in the woods as such?

By: twblack

twblack — Thu, 11 May 2006 08:46:11 +0000

You know I heard a TV show say one time “The Truth Is Out Their” Oh lord where is it!

By: dewhurst

dewhurst — Thu, 11 May 2006 08:28:01 +0000

JSmith-Dewhurst is also a fellow Englishman.

Tally ho!

By: jamin19

jamin19 — Thu, 11 May 2006 05:33:33 +0000

I dunno if anyone will get this far down to read this but I must say that it appears to me that the quality of the BFRO’s investigation and reporting practices has diminished to the point of not being recognized as a “Scientific Research Organization” and that getting involved with a “Cat Fight” with such an organization would only lower the credibility of one’s self!

By: silverage

silverage — Thu, 11 May 2006 03:17:03 +0000

This is such a joke. Does ANYONE on this site really believe that if such an incredible discovery had been made, that organizations such as the WWF or the National Geographic Society, would not be yelling from the rooftops about such a find. This is just another way to make people like us look foolish once again. Penn and Teller were not enough. Now people can laugh at us, as we sit back and anxiously await this so called “book”. A book that has no announced publishing date. A book that claims it has earth shattering photos, yet the person who took what can be the most important scientific photos of the century wants to remain unknown. The more and more I hear about this Malaysian Bigfoot, the more and more I think we will be humiliated once again.

Lord, I wish I could eat these words

By: inspector71

inspector71 — Thu, 11 May 2006 00:25:35 +0000

as far as i am concerned bfro is a joke i have deleted them from favorites a long time ago. as far as information goes i can get more here, all bfro is looking for is dollars it is understood that it takes money to run an operation but their web site suffers from dead issue disorders and links that are unavailable they need to reprioritize.

By: fuzzy

fuzzy — Wed, 10 May 2006 23:42:26 +0000

DWA-26: Thanks!
Ferreting ~ I love it!

I think releasing pre-pub teaser pix from a book about, say, chimps, would encourage people interested in chimps to buy the book, and those pix would probably not generate “Cryptoversy” or negative press ~

BUT ~ Releasing even one pic from a book about a captive group of, say, pterodactyls, without proper scientific confirmation, could only generate the kind of dissecting, criticizing, hypothesizing, fraternizing and juvenile mud-slinging we have seen recently, with the result that many of the book’s potential buyers would turn away in disgust!

There’s only one way to properly deliver this kind of mind-bending information, and that is to maintain total control of it, and that’s what the photo owners are doing.

As I asked in another thread, if you had clear, unambiguous close-up color photos of Nessie, what would you do?

By: Ole Bub

Ole Bub — Wed, 10 May 2006 23:17:35 +0000

Agreed Dewhurst….the fuss should be about validating and preserving the creatures…not BFRO…or us…JMHO

seeing is believing…

ole bub and the dawgs

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 10 May 2006 20:50:47 +0000

Well, we’re certainly ferreting out new species of life on this thread!

Fuzz: my haiku man! Bravo. And so on point.

Bottom line: I wouldn’t give anyone a picture from the book before the book’s in their hands. They have too much to LOSE. A picture — without the wealth of how-we-got-it background that sure better be in the book….oh hell why go on? Let me just say: Patterson film.