Look at what happens when a minnow, or an owl with a distinct color pattern goes on the endangered species list: industry comes to a halt. Development comes to a halt. In other words, economic growth comes to a halt.

Could anyone imagine what would happen IF all undeveloped land in the US is suddenly declared to be habitat for something as rare as a sasquatch. The entire continental United States would be stagnant. No new homes, buildings, assembly plants, farms (not that new farms are popping up). There would be no new anything built again on land that isn’t currently developed or has a structure on it.

Yes, I believe the government is hiding the sasquatch. And I believe they (both democrat and republican) are in on it for the reasons I have stated. Just imagine no new housing developments. No new schools, warehouses…. Even for that matter, no new roads through the habitat (which is *everyplace*) of an endangered species.

Great Post!! To believe that the government doesn’t know about the sasquatches existence is a far bigger absurdity than believing that an unknown (unclassified) hominid inhabits our deep wilderness areas (as well as some cosmopolitan areas).

I recently found downloadable word files of the SCI /Non Disclosure Form—one of many such forms the government uses inside the U.S. Department of the Interior—Bureau of Land Management and the US Fish and Wildlife Dept. (SCI = Sensitive Compartmentalized Information) Why are these non disclosure agreements needed by these agencies? If not to guard against the public knowing certain things regarding wildlife, environmental issues etc., then what?

Like Sharonlee; “I just wonder a lot”.

I have spoken to people who believe they have SEEN a sasquatch with their own eyes. There are those who are questionable but then there are still more than a handful who are sober, sane, coherent and reliable.

It may appear that the “government” seems to be too busy ruining us morally, financially and environmentally to be paying attention to the unending media parade of bigfoot related television shows, newspaper articles, internet radio shows, books etc., but I would imagine they know what is being put out there for public consumption.

The “government” accounts for every single person being born, living and dying in the United States. Just try hiding from them! lol. They know how many bears, deer, mountain lions occupy a certain area. A close estimate at least.

Maybe we are crazy! Are we delusional to believe that there are big, hairy men running through our forests? Why would credible, successful individuals make such outlandish claims?

I am not 100% sure of anything, ever. I just wonder, “what if” a lot.

Excerpt

“…Facts and rumours, as well as a story dispensed by a wartime SAS officer, may shed some light on the many mysteries of the Antarctic arena—a front that has been kept secret for 60 years—and on a hostile encounter that will NEVER be divulged to the public…

During the winter months, the two survivors made absurd claims over the radio about “Polar Men, ancient tunnels and Nazis”. Radio contact was finally lost in July 1945, … as we listened to the fear in the voice: “…the Polar Men have found us!” was screamed before contact was lost…

Disconcerted is too weak a word to describe how we felt when the survivor replied to the Major’s questions about the escaped Polar Man’s intentions: “He will wait, watch and wonder just how different we taste….

None of us was expecting what we saw, and the Polar Man had fled into the surrounding terrain so quick that only a few token shots were fired. Out of fear and awe at what we had seen, we all decided to go into the bunker. Go in we did, and two bodies were found. The soldier who had pulled the short straw was found with his throat ripped out, and, more heinous, the survivor had been stripped to the bones….

The Polar Man was slain as he was lured to the camp. The scientist decided that the Polar Man was “human” but, it seemed, had been able to produce more hair and withstand the cold far more effectively….”

from BRITAIN’S SECRET WAR IN ANTARCTICA
By James Roberts

About the Author:
James Robert is a civil servant with an agency of the UK Ministry of Defence, as well as a World War II historian and writer. He has travelled extensively throughout North Africa and Europe to investigate mysteries of Britain’s secret wars. With a family from a military background, and with German sources giving many so-called “myths” credence, he has set a personal mission to delve deeper into the strange, suppressed, little-known and anomalous activities that were conducted before, during and after the war against Germany. “Britain’s Secret War in Antarctica” has been taken from his forthcoming book that will document some of his investigations.

Is there someone posting on this discussion board that wants to deny that the Mt. St. Helens area was a huge tract of wilderness containing what we now speculatively describe as perfect sasquatch habitat; as good or better than most any other? If it was perfect habitat; and in light of the numbers of reported sightings in the area over the years, it was; then why did we not find sasquatch remains within the 230 square mile area of devastation. (that’s approx. 15 x 15 miles of unpopulated, heavily wooded, mountainous terrain containing many lakes, streams and rivers) The only conclusions we can logically arrive at in addressing this quandary are:

(1) That all sasquatch remains were completely buried by ash and never found. While this explanation is plausible for some carcasses it is doubtful that all would remain invisible. Many large mammal carcasses were readily found and removed.

(2) That there were no sasquatches within the 230 sq. mile area. This is tantamount to serious speculation that the sasquatch does not exist at all, in any location. (If they weren’t extant in the Mt. St. Helens area they don’t exist anywhere.)

(3) The last possibility is that there were carcasses found but these were removed secretly. This possibility would of course require collaboration between the searchers, the managing agency and the government at large. For any student of history our government is riddled by controversy and clandestine activities, usually under the guise of “what’s best for the many”. Unfortunately the origin of that ideology escapes most.

In my opinion any of the above seem unlikely, but of these only the last one is plausible. Anyone dismissing the last explanation, out of hand, as “silliness” or “nonsense” needs to rethink their position. If some “sasquatch expert” wants to insult the poster for merely considering the only possibilities, I for one, would very much be interested in hearing their explanation.