<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Surprise Fossil Announcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/ceprano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/ceprano/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JungleHusky</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/ceprano/comment-page-1/#comment-67980</link>
		<dc:creator>JungleHusky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=41298#comment-67980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote:
&quot;The previously described species, named from fossil finds found in Italy, &lt;em&gt;Homo cepranensis&lt;/em&gt; may turn out to be more of a great-great-great-great (etc.) grandfather than a cousin.&quot;
END

As a student of Anthropology the issue of relative dating depends on many factors including the dating method used. This report is somewhat of an outlier as &quot;For the study, she and colleagues Aurelien Mounier and Giorgio Manzi compared Ceprano with 42 fossils from Africa and Eurasia ranging from 1.8 million to 12,000 years ago. The scientists also compared Ceprano to 68 modern humans.&quot; 

This is significant as it does not specify whether they did a visual comparison using just eyesight, a computer scan, or just comparison of previous statistics after say, radiocarbon dating. 

With that said, advocates of &quot;Forbidden Archaeology&quot; will not find this new timeline surprising. Corrections are but mere stepping stones to the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;The previously described species, named from fossil finds found in Italy, <em>Homo cepranensis</em> may turn out to be more of a great-great-great-great (etc.) grandfather than a cousin.&#8221;<br />
END</p>
<p>As a student of Anthropology the issue of relative dating depends on many factors including the dating method used. This report is somewhat of an outlier as &#8220;For the study, she and colleagues Aurelien Mounier and Giorgio Manzi compared Ceprano with 42 fossils from Africa and Eurasia ranging from 1.8 million to 12,000 years ago. The scientists also compared Ceprano to 68 modern humans.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is significant as it does not specify whether they did a visual comparison using just eyesight, a computer scan, or just comparison of previous statistics after say, radiocarbon dating. </p>
<p>With that said, advocates of &#8220;Forbidden Archaeology&#8221; will not find this new timeline surprising. Corrections are but mere stepping stones to the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 30/39 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-05-19 10:11:07 by W3 Total Cache -->