<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happens If You Kill A Mystery Cat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63864</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RandyS.

If I&#039;m sadly misinformed, why do you agree with me, hmmmm?  Well, yeah, in that first paragraph you agree with me, i.e., you are right. Then you fly off the road.

I&#039;ll bet that if you look at the OR game regulations you&#039;ll find out YOU better read your OR game regulations.  This from - wait for it - the 2010 regs:

&quot;Predatory Animals are coyotes, rabbits, rodents, and feral swine which are or may be destructive to agricultural crops. Therefore these animals have no closed season, bag limit or weapons restriction.&quot;

See that coyote in there?  Hidin&#039; from yuh, wudnit?  They frequently use cover like that, to avoid hunters who don&#039;t read the game regs.  You can ONLY take a coyote in OR because THEY ARE MENTIONED as having no limit.

See the porcupine in there?  Better put your gun away, son, if not.  They are covered under &quot;rodents.&quot;

See the rabbits in there?  LOTS, dude.  NOTORIOUS users of cover.  If you don&#039;t read, that is, past the &#039;cover&#039; of the game regs.  ;-)

You can shoot, club, trap, drown, chase down with dogs, etc. any or as many of them as you want.  THE REGS SAY SO, SPECIFICALLY.

So, you wanna test me out there, son,  you just go shoot yerself sumpin&#039; that ain&#039;t mentioned in them thar regs.  Then let ol&#039; Dr. DWA show you:

1) yes they are; or 
2) nice sasquatch, buddy!  And good luck with the law.  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RandyS.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m sadly misinformed, why do you agree with me, hmmmm?  Well, yeah, in that first paragraph you agree with me, i.e., you are right. Then you fly off the road.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet that if you look at the OR game regulations you&#8217;ll find out YOU better read your OR game regulations.  This from &#8211; wait for it &#8211; the 2010 regs:</p>
<p>&#8220;Predatory Animals are coyotes, rabbits, rodents, and feral swine which are or may be destructive to agricultural crops. Therefore these animals have no closed season, bag limit or weapons restriction.&#8221;</p>
<p>See that coyote in there?  Hidin&#8217; from yuh, wudnit?  They frequently use cover like that, to avoid hunters who don&#8217;t read the game regs.  You can ONLY take a coyote in OR because THEY ARE MENTIONED as having no limit.</p>
<p>See the porcupine in there?  Better put your gun away, son, if not.  They are covered under &#8220;rodents.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the rabbits in there?  LOTS, dude.  NOTORIOUS users of cover.  If you don&#8217;t read, that is, past the &#8216;cover&#8217; of the game regs.  <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You can shoot, club, trap, drown, chase down with dogs, etc. any or as many of them as you want.  THE REGS SAY SO, SPECIFICALLY.</p>
<p>So, you wanna test me out there, son,  you just go shoot yerself sumpin&#8217; that ain&#8217;t mentioned in them thar regs.  Then let ol&#8217; Dr. DWA show you:</p>
<p>1) yes they are; or<br />
2) nice sasquatch, buddy!  And good luck with the law.  <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westonoto</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63825</link>
		<dc:creator>westonoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 04:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s apparent that game laws differ from state to state. Here in Maine, it would indeed be illegal to kill any cryptid, as only animals specifically allowed to be hunted have an open season. All other birds and animals are considered non-game species and it is illegal to take one. It&#039;s also illegal to shoot fish here, lol.

As for the contention that if you were alone in the woods, you could get away with a &quot;self-defense&quot; claim. Well, I wouldn&#039;t hang my hat on that one either. From my time in Alaska I can tell you that the out-of-state &quot;fishermen&quot; who just happened to &quot;defend themselves&quot; against Brown Bear attacks were investigated just as thoroughly as if it had been a human that they had killed (I think the penalty might even be worse to be honest), and a number of them had been found to have just used self defense as an excuse to kill a Brownie. They did jail and paid as much as $10k in fines. Some places take that stuff very seriously.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s apparent that game laws differ from state to state. Here in Maine, it would indeed be illegal to kill any cryptid, as only animals specifically allowed to be hunted have an open season. All other birds and animals are considered non-game species and it is illegal to take one. It&#8217;s also illegal to shoot fish here, lol.</p>
<p>As for the contention that if you were alone in the woods, you could get away with a &#8220;self-defense&#8221; claim. Well, I wouldn&#8217;t hang my hat on that one either. From my time in Alaska I can tell you that the out-of-state &#8220;fishermen&#8221; who just happened to &#8220;defend themselves&#8221; against Brown Bear attacks were investigated just as thoroughly as if it had been a human that they had killed (I think the penalty might even be worse to be honest), and a number of them had been found to have just used self defense as an excuse to kill a Brownie. They did jail and paid as much as $10k in fines. Some places take that stuff very seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandyS</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63688</link>
		<dc:creator>RandyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Returning to this forum a bit late, but...

DWA, I am afraid that you are sadly misinformed. At least here in Oregon, hunting is NOT illegal, but it IS a licensed activity (like driving). And there ARE certain species for which specific tags are required in order to hunt them. Additionally, there are other species which the law says can only be hunted during certain times of the year, other species for which specific bag limits are imposed even though there is no seasonal limitation, and even some species which are protected from predation by hunters altogether (song birds, for instance, and moose and wolves -- even though it has yet to be proven that those two species actually &quot;live&quot; in Oregon). 

For other species, NOT SPECIFIED BY THE GAME REGULATIONS, there is no season or bag limit imposed. Animals that fall within this category, but which are not named in the game regulations, include (but are not limited to) coyotes, porcupines, rabbits, and I would bet, unicorns and sasquatch.

In fact, since there is no bag limit, why stop with just one unicorn, or one sasquatch?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Returning to this forum a bit late, but&#8230;</p>
<p>DWA, I am afraid that you are sadly misinformed. At least here in Oregon, hunting is NOT illegal, but it IS a licensed activity (like driving). And there ARE certain species for which specific tags are required in order to hunt them. Additionally, there are other species which the law says can only be hunted during certain times of the year, other species for which specific bag limits are imposed even though there is no seasonal limitation, and even some species which are protected from predation by hunters altogether (song birds, for instance, and moose and wolves &#8212; even though it has yet to be proven that those two species actually &#8220;live&#8221; in Oregon). </p>
<p>For other species, NOT SPECIFIED BY THE GAME REGULATIONS, there is no season or bag limit imposed. Animals that fall within this category, but which are not named in the game regulations, include (but are not limited to) coyotes, porcupines, rabbits, and I would bet, unicorns and sasquatch.</p>
<p>In fact, since there is no bag limit, why stop with just one unicorn, or one sasquatch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukedog</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63639</link>
		<dc:creator>lukedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shoot a Cryptid feline ?  hardly an offence in Australia,  we could still shoot  indigenous Aboriginals  quite legally until the mid 1960&#039;s]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoot a Cryptid feline ?  hardly an offence in Australia,  we could still shoot  indigenous Aboriginals  quite legally until the mid 1960&#8242;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tropicalwolf</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63637</link>
		<dc:creator>tropicalwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are willing to extrapolate from &quot;mountain lion&quot; to &quot;mystery cat,&quot; this about sums it up for Ohio...

&quot;Chris Gilkey, Adams County Wildlife Officer, said cougars and mountain lions are not regulated by the state of Ohio and can be killed by anyone with a hunting license. He also said they can be killed without a license if they pose a threat to human life or livestock.&quot; (circa May, 2009)

If its &quot;one-on-one&quot; in the woods, who is to say whether or not the animal actually posed a threat or not.  Like history, the winner (survivor) writes the &quot;truth.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are willing to extrapolate from &#8220;mountain lion&#8221; to &#8220;mystery cat,&#8221; this about sums it up for Ohio&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Chris Gilkey, Adams County Wildlife Officer, said cougars and mountain lions are not regulated by the state of Ohio and can be killed by anyone with a hunting license. He also said they can be killed without a license if they pose a threat to human life or livestock.&#8221; (circa May, 2009)</p>
<p>If its &#8220;one-on-one&#8221; in the woods, who is to say whether or not the animal actually posed a threat or not.  Like history, the winner (survivor) writes the &#8220;truth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63622</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is what the Illinois regulations have to say. Clearly, the default position is that a wild animal can only be hunted if specific authorization exists. This would appear to make it illegal to shoot a bigfoot in Illinois. The loophole appears to be that the landowner or tenant could authorize it, unless the species is protected.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Wild mammals and parts thereof, which shall include their green hides, are protected EXCEPT as authorized by a hunting or trapping season, and include: woodchuck, gray squirrel, fox squirrel, eastern cottontail rabbit, swamp rabbit, white-tailed deer, muskrat, beaver, raccoon, opossum, least weasel, long-tailed weasel, mink, striped skunk, red fox, gray fox, badger and coyote.

Wild mammals and parts thereof, which shall include their green hides, are protected throughout the year and include: grey/timber wolves, river otter, bobcat, flying squirrel, red squirrel, eastern woodrat, golden mouse, rice rat and bats.

It shall be unlawful for any person to take any other living wild animal not covered above without the permission of the landowner or tenant. &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is what the Illinois regulations have to say. Clearly, the default position is that a wild animal can only be hunted if specific authorization exists. This would appear to make it illegal to shoot a bigfoot in Illinois. The loophole appears to be that the landowner or tenant could authorize it, unless the species is protected.</p>
<blockquote><p>Wild mammals and parts thereof, which shall include their green hides, are protected EXCEPT as authorized by a hunting or trapping season, and include: woodchuck, gray squirrel, fox squirrel, eastern cottontail rabbit, swamp rabbit, white-tailed deer, muskrat, beaver, raccoon, opossum, least weasel, long-tailed weasel, mink, striped skunk, red fox, gray fox, badger and coyote.</p>
<p>Wild mammals and parts thereof, which shall include their green hides, are protected throughout the year and include: grey/timber wolves, river otter, bobcat, flying squirrel, red squirrel, eastern woodrat, golden mouse, rice rat and bats.</p>
<p>It shall be unlawful for any person to take any other living wild animal not covered above without the permission of the landowner or tenant. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63621</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wolfatrest:

Nothing you say addresses anything I did.  Except I think it&#039;s *your* sensitivity about bearing arms that&#039;s coming to the fore here, not mine.

Killing cryptids is breaking an established law - the law against shooting ANY animal you are not EXPLICITLY allowed to shoot.  (If you are allowed to shoot as many animals as you want to bring the desired population down to zero, it is because the hunting regs EXPLICITLY allow you to.  They name the species and set the limit:  open all year; no limit.)

I&#039;m right.  Period.  Unless you show otherwise.

(You won&#039;t.  ;-)  )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wolfatrest:</p>
<p>Nothing you say addresses anything I did.  Except I think it&#8217;s *your* sensitivity about bearing arms that&#8217;s coming to the fore here, not mine.</p>
<p>Killing cryptids is breaking an established law &#8211; the law against shooting ANY animal you are not EXPLICITLY allowed to shoot.  (If you are allowed to shoot as many animals as you want to bring the desired population down to zero, it is because the hunting regs EXPLICITLY allow you to.  They name the species and set the limit:  open all year; no limit.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m right.  Period.  Unless you show otherwise.</p>
<p>(You won&#8217;t.  <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfatrest</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63617</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfatrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 10:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To DWA, I tend to disagree. Things are illegal when you are breaking an established law in doing them.  Hunting regulations are in place to regulate the number of animals killed, preserving the desired population.  As in the example of wild hogs, in some areas the desired population is zero, therefore the limit is however many you can manage to kill.  The right to bear arms sometimes has little or nothing to do with hunting.  I know several people who love to target shoot but have no interest whatsoever in hunting.  Maybe we should leave our opinions about whether or not people should own guns out of this discussion.  Since cryptids are NOT protected by law, then it is NOT illegal to kill them.  Immoral and reprehensible, I&#039;d agree, but not illegal.  That said, the only way you&#039;ll prove to the majority of people in the existence of a creature such as a Sasquatch is with a body, living or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To DWA, I tend to disagree. Things are illegal when you are breaking an established law in doing them.  Hunting regulations are in place to regulate the number of animals killed, preserving the desired population.  As in the example of wild hogs, in some areas the desired population is zero, therefore the limit is however many you can manage to kill.  The right to bear arms sometimes has little or nothing to do with hunting.  I know several people who love to target shoot but have no interest whatsoever in hunting.  Maybe we should leave our opinions about whether or not people should own guns out of this discussion.  Since cryptids are NOT protected by law, then it is NOT illegal to kill them.  Immoral and reprehensible, I&#8217;d agree, but not illegal.  That said, the only way you&#8217;ll prove to the majority of people in the existence of a creature such as a Sasquatch is with a body, living or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63612</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In the first case, there are no laws (nor could there be) against harming an animal that is not even proved to exist. You may as well worry about whether shooting a unicorn will get you in trouble with the law.&quot;

This is wrong.  

There could be such laws, because there ARE.  All across this great land of ours, in fact.  

If you shoot a unicorn, a brontosaurus, or a sasquatch, you better hope the law doesn&#039;t find out.  Because it&#039;s ILLEGAL.

In fact, hunting in the United States is ILLEGAL.  Period.

OK, with exceptions.

Which are called - wait for it - hunting regulations.

Cutting to the chase:  if you shoot anything other than what the hunting regulations say you can shoot, you have committed a crime.  This goes for shooting known animals out of season; known animals for which the season is closed; and ANY ANIMAL NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE REGULATIONS as OK to hunt

Hunting regs were designed - specifically - to harness yahoos who take the right to bear arms a bit too far.  If you aren&#039;t shooting at something that you have been told - by the letter of the regs - is legal, you are shooting illegally.  Period.

Killing cryptids is illegal, folks.  Get a camera if that&#039;s the trophy you want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the first case, there are no laws (nor could there be) against harming an animal that is not even proved to exist. You may as well worry about whether shooting a unicorn will get you in trouble with the law.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is wrong.  </p>
<p>There could be such laws, because there ARE.  All across this great land of ours, in fact.  </p>
<p>If you shoot a unicorn, a brontosaurus, or a sasquatch, you better hope the law doesn&#8217;t find out.  Because it&#8217;s ILLEGAL.</p>
<p>In fact, hunting in the United States is ILLEGAL.  Period.</p>
<p>OK, with exceptions.</p>
<p>Which are called &#8211; wait for it &#8211; hunting regulations.</p>
<p>Cutting to the chase:  if you shoot anything other than what the hunting regulations say you can shoot, you have committed a crime.  This goes for shooting known animals out of season; known animals for which the season is closed; and ANY ANIMAL NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE REGULATIONS as OK to hunt</p>
<p>Hunting regs were designed &#8211; specifically &#8211; to harness yahoos who take the right to bear arms a bit too far.  If you aren&#8217;t shooting at something that you have been told &#8211; by the letter of the regs &#8211; is legal, you are shooting illegally.  Period.</p>
<p>Killing cryptids is illegal, folks.  Get a camera if that&#8217;s the trophy you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JungleHusky</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/catworries/comment-page-1/#comment-63607</link>
		<dc:creator>JungleHusky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=29820#comment-63607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To tropicalwolf, everyone is entitled to their opinion. I agree with you that ignorance is not a solid defense (defence). You are also somewhat correct to argue that he invited the Jaguar into the trap by rubbing scat at that location, and from a judicial point of view, the next question would be to determine if his &#039;invitation&#039; makes him accountable for the death of the animal that followed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To tropicalwolf, everyone is entitled to their opinion. I agree with you that ignorance is not a solid defense (defence). You are also somewhat correct to argue that he invited the Jaguar into the trap by rubbing scat at that location, and from a judicial point of view, the next question would be to determine if his &#8216;invitation&#8217; makes him accountable for the death of the animal that followed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 30/48 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-05-20 23:56:07 by W3 Total Cache -->