Comments on: Bugs: Where Are You?

By: chrisandclauida2

chrisandclauida2 — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:27:38 +0000

I just love how a group of supposed investigators hobbyists or enthusiasts make so many darned assumptions about everything they discuss. This isn’t a bigfoot because everyone knows bigfoot doesn’t walk like that etc etc etc.

In this case we see assumptions about the soil make up of a place no one knows the exact location or that the guy was terminally ill in 2000 some odd date so he must be dead. The fact that soil types vary as you go deeper or even across a river or valley or under certain vegetation should kill the assumption that the evidence would have turned to dust. We must also remember that terminally ill people can live years or decades thanks to modern science. Treatments for things like aids liver and kidney disease that would mean a short life span just 10 or so years ago can now be put on hold for years or decades.

Whether or not this guy was telling the truth or even partial truth is something we may never know. I chock his story up to interesting if true but I’m not searching the Texas panhandle with ground penetrating radar nor will I start anytime soon.

His story has a distinct possibility to be true or partially true. How many hunters who are armed have reported sightings? How many haven’t reported their sightings out of fear of ridicule. I would guess that at least one hunter fired on these creatures. One home owner must have fired on some huge monster like creature terrorizing his family. So the possibility that someone one shot and killed a bigfoot creature is a possibility.

As a person who has experience in investigations and interviews, I know people often add details to the reports. They do so out of feeling they need to impress the interviewer that they know what they are talking about or saw.

So could bugs have taken a shot at a bigfoot, yes. Could he have killed one, yes. Could he have then buried the creature, yes. Could agent orange have fried his brain cells to the point he thinks his wife is queen of the sasquatch and he has shacked up with her to atone for his murderous rampage and deaths of her royal court, yes.

Bottom line is anything could be true. I have spent years trying to get the truth out of those wanting to lie to me. I can usually tell when someone is lying about something. Then again I could be suffering from delusions of grandeur and be full of bigfoot feces.

None of what anyone says on this subject is of any real importance to us as those who endeavor to find or learn the truth of sasquatch till bugs says X marks the spot and a body is dug up.

By: Benjamin Radford

Benjamin Radford — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:04:38 +0000

If you believe this story, I’ve got some beachfront property I’d like to show you…

By: ddh1969

ddh1969 — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:18:12 +0000

Todd Standing is worthless. I heard him on the C2C a few weeks ago where he had all this groundbreaking info and research. The DVD supposedly was held up in customs, however, he managed to send audio from that awful sylvanic video that came out some time ago…with the ‘beast’ behind some snow covered trees. A total joke. A total farce. A total waste of time. Thanks to guys like Todd Standing ’squatch research will never be taken seriously. He probably plays cards with Biscardi and Moneymaker.

By: deejay

deejay — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:00:35 +0000

Bugs is a liar, and so is Todd Standing. Why is it so hard for people to see that? I want Bigfoot to be real as much as the next guy, but there are just too many people like these two guys getting attention for talking crap. The amount of attention they get amazes me, their stories are worthless.

By: AtomicMrEMonster

AtomicMrEMonster — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:20:30 +0000

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but didn’t “Bugs” claim to be terminally ill (due to exposure from Agent Orange) in 2001? Six years later and he’s still not dead? Am I missing something here?

By: Bpl

Bpl — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:42:59 +0000

It is always funny to me how some of these stories, with NOTHING other than verbal statements to back them up get so much attention. Is it because they merely decided not to include a laughable fake picture along with their story that they suddenly have more merit. This guy felt so terribly sorry for this wounded animal that he went and shot its mate too? In this group of trappers/hunters no one thought that it might be a good idea to at least take pictures, or a piece of the carcass? Hell, even if you were scared of prosecution, if you just had the hand (or other piece) you could say you took it from a creature that you found dead. Give me a map? Give me a break.

By: dharkheart

dharkheart — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:12:12 +0000

Perhaps another call in to ‘Coast to Coast AM’ might get a response. After all, “Bugs” called the show when Art hosted it maybe “Bugs” still listens.

Just a thought.

By: captiannemo

captiannemo — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:15:41 +0000

I think Bugs should send the map here to Cryptomundo where Mr.Woolheater and Mr. Coleman can do what they do best!

I would LOVE to see real proof posted on this site.

These guys work hard and deserve it.

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:46:44 +0000

Oh, I forgot to mention that Todd Standing put out a lame (desperate sounding) appeal to Bugs the other night on the radio too…Pathetic.

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:42:05 +0000

I guess giving the map to Morgan would be (sightly) better than Biscardi. However, if these things are out there (alive all over the continent) then GET YOUR OWN! Leave this old guy alone and get your bloody own.

Who needs Bugs, I say. Patterson and Gimlin didn’t need him, so be a man (or woman) and get your own; Bigfoot hunters! Oh yeah, bring a LIVE one in too.