Reasons:

It appears the “print” was stamped “toe to heel” to get a good, solid, non-smeared outline of the toes (also, slippage is shown in the heel).

Photo of just one print, not the entire alleged track.

No perspective (take notes, would-be evidence collectors)…yes, congrats for including a measuring device, but how about a wide-angle to put the print in perspective. There is nothing that links photo 1 to photo 2 by way of evidence. The “print” could have been in the person’s backyard, and then the picture of him with the cast taken by some random cornfield. For evidence, you need to LINK your photos. (I’ll take some of this back IF that is some “left over” plaster in the lower left corner of photo 2)

No litter. Any print/track caster knows that this SET UP would be a “dream scenario” for a common animal print, let alone a sasquatch print.

Too narrow.

Too much like the naked foot in photo 3 (same wide, bulbous first toe & and narrow, oddly curved foot)…reeks of one of those gel/petroleum fake enlargements.

All this just MHO…take it for what its worth.

It looks like the man’s left foot is in a left print, which means the print he decided to photograph appeared when the animal was standing still, which would explain the extra pressure in the back and would explain why it was so perfect.

It would also create more holes in an already compromised story, so there’s that.

But I’m not sure how relevant your own muddy footprints are, CryptoInformant 2.0. Mud can have varying amounts of water, sand, clay, and organic matter, and how well it preserves a print will depend in part on the composition of the mud.

Doesn’t mean there might not be Ole Hairys in the Triangle, though. But to reiterate, the footprint does look “fishy” to me.

The absence of “trash” around the track is indeed troubling, as Loren so insightfully pointed out.

Praetorian:

There have been sightings of UFOs and other weird lights around the area that cannot be explained away as MERELY lights from “nearby” Logan airport. I do not claim to know exactly what is going on in this “hotspot,” but I CAN tell you this—there is “something” going on in the Triangle. And it is NOT totally explainable to “mundane” stuff.

Yes, most notably is a Sasquatch/Bigfoot known as Crippled Foot.
There are several casts of this specimen, and the left foot is badly disformed or injured. The left cast seems to show a partial missing toe and most of the rest are misaligned/bent. Additionally there are bulges along the outside of the foot. I believe some of suggested that perhaps this one got its foot caught in an animal trap. It was in Grover Krantz book where he compared it to human foot anatomy and he was convinced the deformities do correlate with foot anatomy.

I’ve always wondered why so many of the cast footprints are so perfect. The toes are always in just the right positions. They always seem to have a perfect stair-step formation going from the great toe down to the wee toe. I can’t even get a good footprint of myself! I can walk in the sand or mud and my toe prints are always smeared and messy, the hell sloshes to the left or the right, yet most of the Bigfoot prints I see look as if Bigfoot had stuck his foot into cement at Mann’s Chinese Theatre.

Are there any Bigfoot prints with misshapen toes. For example, my second toe is MUCH longer than my great toe. Have there been any casted tracks that show non-uniform toes?