<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive from Josh Gates on Yeti Tracks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: starbuckle</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-51161</link>
		<dc:creator>starbuckle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-51161</guid>
		<description>Josh is without talent and just a typical idiot.  His voice is annoyingly nasal and his acting, while pretending to find mysterious creatures, is awful.  He could care less about what he's supposed to be looking for, and he's definitely no outdoors-man as he claims.  Just a buffoon with a camera in his face.  It's actually pretty sad.  A Cub Scout would be more effective.

This is just the same formula that "Most Haunted" uses.  One more useless show to help you become hypnotized by your television.  Don't even bother with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh is without talent and just a typical idiot.  His voice is annoyingly nasal and his acting, while pretending to find mysterious creatures, is awful.  He could care less about what he&#8217;s supposed to be looking for, and he&#8217;s definitely no outdoors-man as he claims.  Just a buffoon with a camera in his face.  It&#8217;s actually pretty sad.  A Cub Scout would be more effective.</p>
<p>This is just the same formula that &#8220;Most Haunted&#8221; uses.  One more useless show to help you become hypnotized by your television.  Don&#8217;t even bother with this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37731</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37731</guid>
		<description>Once again, I will re-state what I've noted hundreds of times: All DNA results from the analyses of Yeti, Bigfoot, and other unknown hominoid samples are bound to come back "inconclusive," or "near human but not human," or "primate, species unknown," until a type specimen of a new hominoid species is available through a body or live specimen.

So that's why documentary companies, who are more interested in popular science, entertainment and ratings, versus mainstream anthropology, will always hold off until their air dates to broadcast results, which, of course, must be "inconclusive" without the body at hand (dead or alive).

Any outrage at such realities is misplaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, I will re-state what I&#8217;ve noted hundreds of times: All DNA results from the analyses of Yeti, Bigfoot, and other unknown hominoid samples are bound to come back &#8220;inconclusive,&#8221; or &#8220;near human but not human,&#8221; or &#8220;primate, species unknown,&#8221; until a type specimen of a new hominoid species is available through a body or live specimen.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s why documentary companies, who are more interested in popular science, entertainment and ratings, versus mainstream anthropology, will always hold off until their air dates to broadcast results, which, of course, must be &#8220;inconclusive&#8221; without the body at hand (dead or alive).</p>
<p>Any outrage at such realities is misplaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Radford</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37730</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Radford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37730</guid>
		<description>Loren says: "DNA results and other evidence findings for documentary-funded programs are held until the specific episodes are aired."

You're right, Loren. I had forgotten that the series is ongoing and the context of the show.

Still, if it really is the long-awaited DNA evidential proof of the Yeti, the DNA results should be made public immediately, as it will rewrite history. This evidence, if it is what Gates claims it is, should be reported in the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; and in science journals around the world. It should not be held hostage to an airdate for a TV show.

Unless, of course, this turns out to be only the latest in a long series of inconclusive analyses...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren says: &#8220;DNA results and other evidence findings for documentary-funded programs are held until the specific episodes are aired.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, Loren. I had forgotten that the series is ongoing and the context of the show.</p>
<p>Still, if it really is the long-awaited DNA evidential proof of the Yeti, the DNA results should be made public immediately, as it will rewrite history. This evidence, if it is what Gates claims it is, should be reported in the <i>New York Times</i> and in science journals around the world. It should not be held hostage to an airdate for a TV show.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, this turns out to be only the latest in a long series of inconclusive analyses&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37728</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37728</guid>
		<description>Come on, Ben.  You are setting up a weak argument for your outrage here.  You know as well as the next person that DNA results and other evidence findings for documentary-funded programs are held until the specific episodes are aired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Ben.  You are setting up a weak argument for your outrage here.  You know as well as the next person that DNA results and other evidence findings for documentary-funded programs are held until the specific episodes are aired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Radford</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37729</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Radford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37729</guid>
		<description>Hey everybody...

Still waiting for Josh Gates to provide us with the DNA analysis from his track... When's it coming? Anytime soon?

Or was this just a publicity stunt? To quote a slogan from the 1980s: &lt;b&gt;"Where's the beef?" &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody&#8230;</p>
<p>Still waiting for Josh Gates to provide us with the DNA analysis from his track&#8230; When&#8217;s it coming? Anytime soon?</p>
<p>Or was this just a publicity stunt? To quote a slogan from the 1980s: <b>&#8220;Where&#8217;s the beef?&#8221; </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogu4</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37727</link>
		<dc:creator>dogu4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37727</guid>
		<description>Hear, hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystery_man</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37726</link>
		<dc:creator>mystery_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37726</guid>
		<description>I do think the whole thing has played on the "mystery" and "unexplained" to the hilt, but I suppose that's TV for you. I don't think these shows can possibly expect to do an in-depth, scientific treatment of the subject matter in the time they have and still maintain viewer interest. Unfortunately, it seems not everyone who watches these shows is necessarily heavily into cryptozoology or that bothered about the science involved.

I too am a bit disappointed, as others are here, that so much weight would be given to what to me looks like a rather inconclusive print. I am not a big fan of bold proclamations or assumptions that may not be based on the soundest evidence, nor the excited pursuit of things going bump in the night. I don't really think Josh is intentionally hoaxing, but perhaps he is being a bit too quick to rush to make more of these prints than they perhaps warrant. I personally would not say that they are "unexplainable" or of a definite yeti at this time. But hey, it makes for good copy.

Despite what I see to be a lacking in any real thorough, concrete scientific approach to these phenomena, the show is useful in that it is raising awareness and interest in cryptozoology, bringing these stories to people who may not know anything about the things presented. As far as I'm concerned, that counts for something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think the whole thing has played on the &#8220;mystery&#8221; and &#8220;unexplained&#8221; to the hilt, but I suppose that&#8217;s TV for you. I don&#8217;t think these shows can possibly expect to do an in-depth, scientific treatment of the subject matter in the time they have and still maintain viewer interest. Unfortunately, it seems not everyone who watches these shows is necessarily heavily into cryptozoology or that bothered about the science involved.</p>
<p>I too am a bit disappointed, as others are here, that so much weight would be given to what to me looks like a rather inconclusive print. I am not a big fan of bold proclamations or assumptions that may not be based on the soundest evidence, nor the excited pursuit of things going bump in the night. I don&#8217;t really think Josh is intentionally hoaxing, but perhaps he is being a bit too quick to rush to make more of these prints than they perhaps warrant. I personally would not say that they are &#8220;unexplainable&#8221; or of a definite yeti at this time. But hey, it makes for good copy.</p>
<p>Despite what I see to be a lacking in any real thorough, concrete scientific approach to these phenomena, the show is useful in that it is raising awareness and interest in cryptozoology, bringing these stories to people who may not know anything about the things presented. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, that counts for something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37725</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37725</guid>
		<description>Some people take blogs way too seriously. Anyone who has watched "Destination Truth" has to realize that it is for entertainment only. Josh Gates is a nice looking guy with a bit of charisma and I wish I had his job (but I'm ugly with no charisma). I hope he finds some real evidence on any cryptid. It would be outstanding and he and his crew would deserve monumental praise. It would also be an incredible accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people take blogs way too seriously. Anyone who has watched &#8220;Destination Truth&#8221; has to realize that it is for entertainment only. Josh Gates is a nice looking guy with a bit of charisma and I wish I had his job (but I&#8217;m ugly with no charisma). I hope he finds some real evidence on any cryptid. It would be outstanding and he and his crew would deserve monumental praise. It would also be an incredible accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlbertaSasquatch</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37724</link>
		<dc:creator>AlbertaSasquatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37724</guid>
		<description>Just to make a point, I have watched many episodes of &lt;em&gt;Destination Truth&lt;/em&gt; and Josh and his team rarely find anything of interest.

But its still interesting to see him at least try to find, prove or disprove some of the cryptids he has been looking for since this show started.  Actually I have never seen him find any evidence except the Johor footprint and not this nepalese footprint.  So I really don't think the finds were to boost his tv show ratings.  Just my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to make a point, I have watched many episodes of <em>Destination Truth</em> and Josh and his team rarely find anything of interest.</p>
<p>But its still interesting to see him at least try to find, prove or disprove some of the cryptids he has been looking for since this show started.  Actually I have never seen him find any evidence except the Johor footprint and not this nepalese footprint.  So I really don&#8217;t think the finds were to boost his tv show ratings.  Just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrath of the real</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37710</link>
		<dc:creator>wrath of the real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/breaking-gates/#comment-37710</guid>
		<description>WOW......Josh Gates is not a zoologist or a biologist, but he claims to have found and cast prints from a likely unknown hominoid in 2 different locations. Just my 2 cents but he has brought more to my eye than Mr Radford ever has. So he gets 2 weeks to do an investigation, and finds evidence. (whether it is real is up for debate) However like everyone said this is for a tv show that requires ratings. How the hell do we know he or his crew were not out there for a month and say it is a week. Listen I am not out to say either side of this argument over Gates legitimacy has better ground. And thank you Mr Radford for all your "contributions". But lets take this for what it is. A print that is getting cryptozoology "good" media. Eventually the scientific world is going to get fed up and organize the biggest investigation we have ever seen to either prove or disprove these claims. And when that happens we will have our truth. So let the media do its thing, and us do ours. It will come out "smelling like roses in the end". Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW&#8230;&#8230;Josh Gates is not a zoologist or a biologist, but he claims to have found and cast prints from a likely unknown hominoid in 2 different locations. Just my 2 cents but he has brought more to my eye than Mr Radford ever has. So he gets 2 weeks to do an investigation, and finds evidence. (whether it is real is up for debate) However like everyone said this is for a tv show that requires ratings. How the hell do we know he or his crew were not out there for a month and say it is a week. Listen I am not out to say either side of this argument over Gates legitimacy has better ground. And thank you Mr Radford for all your &#8220;contributions&#8221;. But lets take this for what it is. A print that is getting cryptozoology &#8220;good&#8221; media. Eventually the scientific world is going to get fed up and organize the biggest investigation we have ever seen to either prove or disprove these claims. And when that happens we will have our truth. So let the media do its thing, and us do ours. It will come out &#8220;smelling like roses in the end&#8221;. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
