Comments on: Bigfoot or Boot Prints?

By: bigfootresearch

bigfootresearch — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:35:58 +0000

A tread?… what a tire thread?… hahaha which looks like dermals to me, hum. Holy sheet some barkaloungers are real loons with quite the imagination, and wouldn’t have a clue if a SAS jumped out in front of you… BOO…. well ya you would cause your sissified asses would take-off into the wind.

Editor’s note: We normally wouldn’t post a comment that was so derogatory in nature, but we felt that bigfootresearch’s comment should be posted publicly.

At the website that bigfootresearch lists as their website, they state the following:

Caution: We will not tolerate any disrespect toward other researchers, we will not tolerate any infighting, nor will we attempt to smear or discredit others methods or evidence. Material which appears to be fabricated will be removed.

We all have the same goal in this arduous quest, maintaining their safety with presentation of proof.

Apparently, they don’t tolerate any disrespect or infighting on their website, but they believe it’s OK to bring it here to Cryptomundo.

By: zytebac

zytebac — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:27:57 +0000

TCS and Widow, do not get discouraged! I viewed the video with the exact mind-set that it was presented as…’Possible Footprints’. Although I agree with the concensus that they don’t look like squatch prints to me, that does not mean that I felt like the video was misleading at all.
Not everyone is willing to get out there in the muck and the cold to try to find the evidence, and for that I applaud you!
Keep up the good work and hopefully, the next set of prints you find will be indisputable!

By: tropicalwolf

tropicalwolf — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:01:11 +0000

I have some of those five-fingers, Buzzard. Awesome comfy shoes once you’re used to them.

By: Buzzard

Buzzard — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:30:29 +0000

I run trails in a shoe called the Vibram Five Fingers, they leave tracks like this. They are odd looking shoes with toes. Whenever I step in mud on a trail I always think “someone is going to think a bigfoot came through here”.

By: tcsjrbigfoot

tcsjrbigfoot — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:04:42 +0000

This video footage was taken in Ohio at a state park in a restricted no hunting zone and well off any hiking trails. After my 1992 sighting I have been obsessed in searching for the answers and trying my hardest to capture this creature on video. That may never happen but at least I’m trying. I post all my random video footage on YouTube for my viewers who have asked me to do so. I present it just as I found it.

By: squatchwidow

squatchwidow — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:37:26 +0000

Mr. Coleman, I am a new reader, only about six months. I was just surprised when I went to read your page, and found a discussion about a day in which I was involved. I stand corrected. I had so much that I wanted to post, but didn’t want to be too long winded. I should have stated, “If one thinks it looks like a boot”. Your headlines are what started me reading your blogs, and I very much enjoy the skeptical discussions. Sorry for the misspeak. Thank You for your time. Teresa

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:14:11 +0000

Dear Teresa. Ms. Squatchwidow.

Perhaps you are a new reader of Cryptomundo, but I beg you to re-read what I wrote. I did not say anything even close to what you seem to be attributing to me. I did not say it looked “like a boot.”

This blog is about skeptically but openmindedly being curious and investigating. I often give my postings critical-thinking headlines, like “Bigfoot or Boot Prints?” just as the video headlined itself “Possible Footprints?” Those are questions, not statements.

By: squatchwidow

squatchwidow — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:44:31 +0000

Mr. Coleman, First let me say I enjoy your books, blog, and seeing you on Monster Quest. I was with Tcsjrbigfoot in his “Possible Footprints ?“ video. Tim did not claimed those impressions were bigfoot prints. He was simply showing what we saw on the day we went out. We realized that they were not clear, and had no evidentiary value. For comparison sake, he put his boot next to one of the impressions found. In person, we could see what appeared to be toes, and heel. Please understand that there are some who watch his vids who are unable to go out into the woods. Those viewers have asked him to please post his outings, whether he finds something or not. Which is what he did that day, not to deceive or sensationalize, but document. Tim is an honest, hard working, guy…not looking for 15 minutes of fame. He posts what he finds and lets the viewers decide. Boot to you? Ok, I accept your opinion but, in person, it didn’t look like a boot to me. Thanks, Teresa AKA. Squatchwidow

By: erinmar13

erinmar13 — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:20:29 +0000

am i the only one who can see tread in the print? this is an insult to bigfootery.

By: cryptidsrus

cryptidsrus — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:15:30 +0000

I don’t think you’ll find many “takers” here, TCSJRBIGFOOT.
I’m personally not sold on this yet I agree with Spinach Village that the video was somewhat enjoyable and non-sensationalized.