Comments on: The Blue Hill Horror

By: flightsuit

flightsuit — Wed, 30 May 2012 23:36:10 +0000

Corissa_Hall, if you’d bothered to read the previous comments, or even use a little common sense, you would know the story about the kids killing this thing is complete BS. Also, you are commenting in a forum seen all over the world, not typing a text message to your “BFF”. You might want to think about maybe spelling words the way they’re actually spelled.

By: Corissa_Hall

Corissa_Hall — Wed, 30 May 2012 03:00:02 +0000

This “Animal” Looks as if its deaf n blind, Of course it has been in the water, n possibly decayed some. But after reading that it came from a cave that makes since. Like a bat.. Unfortunatley the kids killed it wen they did, bc i could have been reported, n possibly found n studied. But mayb now there will b a search, Of course i am a realist. N I believe if we havent found it before then we should let it b, its thrived on its own this long. Humanity has no reason to interviene. Saying this creature is real of course.. Last night i watched a show on Animal Planet about Mermaids, (Same senerio) Teenagers found it as well, washed up on a beach alive. I would classify this in the same group… As my opinion, Ill believe it wen i see it further.

By: miranda moser

miranda moser — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:08:17 +0000

actually the team on destination truth labeled it as either a diseased sloth or a mutated sloth.
There are sloths in panama…
if you want to watch the video to see their evidence here is the link…

and make sure to choose the video about the cerro azul monster!
i hope this helped you guys out!

By: miranda moser

miranda moser — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:51:55 +0000

I watched an episode of destination truth and they investigated this creature. The description in this photo is false though according to the show.
The kids were actually playing by a river when the creature emerged. Not the sea.
I though the creature was a sloth when i first saw it too, but im open to the idea that it is a new species we have yet to discover.

By: Paint

Paint — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:22:42 +0000

I have to agree with pretty much everyone here, it definitely looks slothlike.

But, then again, I am somewhat creeped out. I recently read an article on monster sightings, and the top ten scariest and all that, and the backstory to this, and its overall appearence bears a striking resemblance to the homo hadalis stories. Of course, the name was pawned from the novel, The Descent, but still, the stories and reports scare the heck out of me.*shiver*

In short, they were described as cave/underground dwelling, white/pale skinned creatures who would occasionally be seen above ground, walking on all fours. Their almost always described as humanoid, and without eyes, or seemingly blind.

Recently I read an article on these complete with a photo of a statue depiction of something similar to the homo hidalis, something along the lines of cave dwellers, and them finding statues depicting humanoid cave creatures with knives, and the article was along the lines of how they couldn’t figure out who (or what) had carved the statues.

Either way, the likeness to the stuff I’ve been reading, and this photo is very eerie (Although, I am sure its just coincidence). But one has to admit, the resemblance is freaky (creature comes out of cave, is ‘assumedly’ hairless, looks like something that could have lived its life underground, has dagger like claws, and is all in all, humanoid enough to creep people out, and as mystery_man wrote, humanoid enough to cause the Uncanny Valley reaction) well, I’m sort of glad that I live in Canada and not Panama at the moment.^^

Even though I’m sure its just coincidence, I thought that might be something to put out there, for a creep factor, if anything.^^

By: dambert

dambert — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:46:03 +0000

Dj Plasmic Nebula pointed out the difference in how the arms lay between the first set of pictures and the last one.

In addition, it appears to me a different background. The last one is a more solid boulder whereas the first one was on a boulder with cracks. The last picture is a smother background, of slightly different color, but the color issue could simply be a case of different exposure on the camera.

It appears to me that someone moved the body to different locations.

By: BunniesLair

BunniesLair — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:53:56 +0000

I think Parkus nailed it with the link to a preserved sloth in formaldehyde.

By: coastlistener63

coastlistener63 — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:30:27 +0000

Well, as you have so eloquently pointed out, there does seem to be some hair. The bait and switch is that whomever posted the picture of the sloth carcass, is apparently trying to deceive us by indicating that it was the same creature after a prolong period of time. There was no mention of it in the original story.

By: laGuerita

laGuerita — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:39:55 +0000

I’m sorry coastlistener63, but have you even read any of the other comments here? It has already been pointed out that the creature does indeed have hair, if you look at the top left of the first picture, and that the carcass in the post photo was not of the same creature, but is the carcass of a sloth shown for comparison. So other than people mistranslating the Spanish, where is the bait and switch?

By: coastlistener63

coastlistener63 — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:17:33 +0000

Well, for starters, the creature is hairless, and the snout is more pronounced. It appears to be larger than a sloth, and the post photo appears to be an actual carcass of a dried up dead sloth. (bait and switch) It may be an experiment gone wrong. There is a very famous laboratory/institute there in Panama that is dedicated to the various creatures that are found in South America. Who knows what goes on there?