<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Short History of Blobsquatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CalebKitson</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-46777</link>
		<dc:creator>CalebKitson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-46777</guid>
		<description>It's just a guess of course.  I wasn't at the exact spot were the photo was taken, and I didn't use a bunch of fancy trig or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a guess of course.  I wasn&#8217;t at the exact spot were the photo was taken, and I didn&#8217;t use a bunch of fancy trig or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalebKitson</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-46776</link>
		<dc:creator>CalebKitson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-46776</guid>
		<description>I spend a lot of time in the woods, and am good at judging the diameter and height of a tree from a photograph.  If one looks at the first picture, and looks at the trees the "Blobsquatch" is in front of, one would notice that the "Blobsquatch" seems to be only three feet tall at the most.  Does anyone agree with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spend a lot of time in the woods, and am good at judging the diameter and height of a tree from a photograph.  If one looks at the first picture, and looks at the trees the &#8220;Blobsquatch&#8221; is in front of, one would notice that the &#8220;Blobsquatch&#8221; seems to be only three feet tall at the most.  Does anyone agree with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10626</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10626</guid>
		<description>I want to coin the word "blobsquatch cub". In the jpeg labeled "Blob1.jpg" (the second one, not the one at the top of the page) if you look just to the left of the circled blobsquatch there is a smaller blob I dub a "blobsquatch cub". To qualify, a blobsquatch cub should always be in the near vicinity of a larger blobsquatch.

And who says there is no progress?

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to coin the word &#8220;blobsquatch cub&#8221;. In the jpeg labeled &#8220;Blob1.jpg&#8221; (the second one, not the one at the top of the page) if you look just to the left of the circled blobsquatch there is a smaller blob I dub a &#8220;blobsquatch cub&#8221;. To qualify, a blobsquatch cub should always be in the near vicinity of a larger blobsquatch.</p>
<p>And who says there is no progress?<br />
 <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10625</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10625</guid>
		<description>Boing Boing mentioned this post today, mentioning it as &lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/11/27/blobsquatches.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;"Blobsquatches."&lt;/a&gt;

Specifically quoted was my mention of Alton Higgins' Willow Creek lecture, which became the first public appearance of the word, as far as has been determined.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boing Boing mentioned this post today, mentioning it as <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/11/27/blobsquatches.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Blobsquatches.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Specifically quoted was my mention of Alton Higgins&#8217; Willow Creek lecture, which became the first public appearance of the word, as far as has been determined.<br />
 <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattBille</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10624</link>
		<dc:creator>MattBille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10624</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry Loren has beaten me to the idea of a companion word: "blogsquatch."  I propose that a blogsquatch is any creature that is debated endlessly in the online world despite there being no compelling new information about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry Loren has beaten me to the idea of a companion word: &#8220;blogsquatch.&#8221;  I propose that a blogsquatch is any creature that is debated endlessly in the online world despite there being no compelling new information about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10623</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10623</guid>
		<description>Oh, the folks-put-on-the-defensive was the (b) to the no-way-it's-a-hoax (a).

To clarify my clarification.

Sheesh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, the folks-put-on-the-defensive was the (b) to the no-way-it&#8217;s-a-hoax (a).</p>
<p>To clarify my clarification.</p>
<p>Sheesh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10622</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10622</guid>
		<description>I should clarify something in what I just said.

A good sas video won't just LOOK compelling.  it will BE compelling; because our evolution as a hunter will tell us that all the appropriate search parameters are THERE.  This ISN'T manipulated; it's real video of a real animal.

Again:  this is why the Patty film has stood up so well for so long. It is compellingly REAL.  The biggest factor in its favor is also the biggest problem with it:  almost everyone associated with both its making and its defense is an amateur.  This (a) rules out a hoax, which would have had to be better-than-Hollywood-studio sophisticated (remember, "Planet of the Apes" was the best Hollywood could do the year after the Patty film), and means that folks trying to defend it get, well, put on the defensive, rather than laughing, out loud, at how anyone could get suckered into such a conspiracy-theory argument as that it's a hoax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify something in what I just said.</p>
<p>A good sas video won&#8217;t just LOOK compelling.  it will BE compelling; because our evolution as a hunter will tell us that all the appropriate search parameters are THERE.  This ISN&#8217;T manipulated; it&#8217;s real video of a real animal.</p>
<p>Again:  this is why the Patty film has stood up so well for so long. It is compellingly REAL.  The biggest factor in its favor is also the biggest problem with it:  almost everyone associated with both its making and its defense is an amateur.  This (a) rules out a hoax, which would have had to be better-than-Hollywood-studio sophisticated (remember, &#8220;Planet of the Apes&#8221; was the best Hollywood could do the year after the Patty film), and means that folks trying to defend it get, well, put on the defensive, rather than laughing, out loud, at how anyone could get suckered into such a conspiracy-theory argument as that it&#8217;s a hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10621</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10621</guid>
		<description>One thing Autumn said that is pretty interesting is the low quality of video evidence due to the opportunity for manipulation.

Just my two cents, but my experience tells me to think that, if it were ever possible to get it (you kind of need a real animal first), a sasquatch video would look pretty compelling.  Three million years of evolution as a predator trumps twenty years of Photoshop, methinks.  We can all of us, maybe once we've trained our eyes a bit for some of us, pick out manipulation on a video of an animal.  There is something about a real animal's movement that is impossible to duplicate.

This is to me the most compelling thing about the Patterson film (other than that EVERY OTHER SUCH RECORD has been either a hoax or a blobsquatch!).  You can tell immediately that it's a moving animal.  And it sure seems surefooted for a guy in a very heavy, very bulky suit with torso and arms way too long for him. River bars are nowhere near as flat as they look.

And motion gives you a dimension that a still photo, relying totally on the quality of a single exposure at a single instant in time, doesn't.

I bet that if we ever get a REAL video of a sas, we won't be sitting around trying to debunk it; we'll all be buying plane tickets and packing our cameras!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing Autumn said that is pretty interesting is the low quality of video evidence due to the opportunity for manipulation.</p>
<p>Just my two cents, but my experience tells me to think that, if it were ever possible to get it (you kind of need a real animal first), a sasquatch video would look pretty compelling.  Three million years of evolution as a predator trumps twenty years of Photoshop, methinks.  We can all of us, maybe once we&#8217;ve trained our eyes a bit for some of us, pick out manipulation on a video of an animal.  There is something about a real animal&#8217;s movement that is impossible to duplicate.</p>
<p>This is to me the most compelling thing about the Patterson film (other than that EVERY OTHER SUCH RECORD has been either a hoax or a blobsquatch!).  You can tell immediately that it&#8217;s a moving animal.  And it sure seems surefooted for a guy in a very heavy, very bulky suit with torso and arms way too long for him. River bars are nowhere near as flat as they look.</p>
<p>And motion gives you a dimension that a still photo, relying totally on the quality of a single exposure at a single instant in time, doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I bet that if we ever get a REAL video of a sas, we won&#8217;t be sitting around trying to debunk it; we&#8217;ll all be buying plane tickets and packing our cameras!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystery_man</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10620</link>
		<dc:creator>mystery_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10620</guid>
		<description>Blobsquatch. What a great word! Any chance this is ever going to make it into the dictionary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blobsquatch. What a great word! Any chance this is ever going to make it into the dictionary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raptorial</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/blobsquatch-history/#comment-10619</link>
		<dc:creator>Raptorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/the-short-history-of-blobsquatching/#comment-10619</guid>
		<description>This is pretty interesting. I liked it so much I quoted it on my cryptozoology site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty interesting. I liked it so much I quoted it on my cryptozoology site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
