Comments on: Biscardi Redux

By: Mnynames

Mnynames — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:27:54 +0000

Well, I’m just thankful that for once the press seems to have done its homework on this guy. Seriously, I think this is the first news piece I’ve seen that was in any way negative about Biscardi beyond the usual “This guy believes in Bigfoot” angle…

By: mystery_man

mystery_man — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:57:45 +0000

Ahh right, DWA, you mentioned that in another post, about “professionals”. I wrote my post without that coming to mind or I would have given you credit for bringing it up first! I’ve always thought this way about Biscardi. The professional is an interesting concept, isn’t it? To make one’s livlihood on keeping the beast a mystery. Unbelievable.

By: DWA

DWA — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:03:35 +0000

Grover Krantz might have called Biscardi a “Professional.”

For his meaning — and why it’s capped and in quotes — read mystery_man’s post. That’s it.

Red herrings keep the buckage flowing in for the true “Professional.” I mean, that’s the point.

By: mystery_man

mystery_man — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:52:18 +0000

I really think Biscardi is one who probably deep down does not want Bigfoot to ever be proven. He is not doing it for the science or the result, but rather for the money he can make on keeping it a strange mystery to make movies about and sell subscriptions and generally be famous. Keeping the myth and the sensationalism alive is what keeps the noteriety and cash flowing in. What will he do if Bigfoot is ever discovered and scientifically catalogued? I suppose he could move on to UFOs.

By: kittenz

kittenz — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:20:55 +0000

>sigh

I guess every discipline has its share of shysters.

By: Harpo

Harpo — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:55:53 +0000

More like “Biscardi Reflux”…

By: Ceroill

Ceroill — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:51:05 +0000

Since when is it a surprise that any group or even subgroup of people has ‘rogues and outsiders’?