Comments on: Biscardi Blamed For Bigfoot Hoax

By: MonsterMash

MonsterMash — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:30:56 +0000

One more thing: Here’s what I don’t get: Kulls says Biscardi wanted to make a Bigfoot autopsy DVD and then blame shadowy government agents for the disappearance of the “body.” So then why did he allow Kulls, Java Bob, et al to unfreeze the “body” and discover the costume?

I have a feeling the SFB was in on this too, and the “autopsy” didn’t come out the way they wanted it to. Maybe it just didn’t look believable, so Biscardi decided to cut his losses and have Bob go on local TV in Indiana to say it was just a costume, and that they were tricked.

That would also explain why the guy who put up $50K isn’t screaming to the media about getting screwed by Biscardi, or, at the very least, going forward with a lawsuit. He may have been in on it too, with the promise that he’d get his $75K from the video sales. Then, oops, they couldn’t get the footage to look believable, so $50K guy had to swallow the loss, with the promise that Biscardi would make it up to him some other way.

By: MonsterMash

MonsterMash — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:26:23 +0000

Anyone out there look at the GA boys’ Bigfoot Tracker website lately and notice that Whitton is gone? Now it’s Dyer and a guy named Mike. They’re tracking leads in Mexico, apparently. Leads for what? Who knows. And I guess Whitton and Dyer’s Hoax Busters show is dead, since it’s been minimized on their mess of a site. I wonder if that’s what led to Whitton parting ways with Dyer.

Personally, I always thought that Dyer screamed con man (he has a shady past), while Whitton struck me as a guy who went along for the ride and wound up in so deep that he had no other choice but to keep going. Hopefully he’s found an honest avenue of employment.

By: cliffhanger042002

cliffhanger042002 — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:50:27 +0000

I don’t believe for one second that Kulls’ should be believed 100%, and that’s not what I was saying. But I don’t think he was as involved as Biscardi. Kulls, in trying to clear his name, is “blowing the whistle” and letting the cat out of the bag and exposing alot of information regarding Biscardi’s fraud/hoax. So alot of new things are coming to light now. Regardless of his spelling and grammer, I think it kinda takes you inside the whole thing, from Kulls perspective, and gives us an idea of how Biscardi planned to profit/benefit from this. And shows what a cold, calculating, scheming worm Biscardi is. Is it possible that that some things have been conveniently left out? Sure, who would incriminate themselves? Anyway, I’m glad he wrote it and put it out there, maybe it could give some investigators something to go on.

By: sneaker98

sneaker98 — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:32:04 +0000

Really, can we trust anyone involved anymore? They’re all cutting and running as fast as they can, who can we really believe?

By: proriter

proriter — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:35:35 +0000

The 10th-grade level of writing in this “official report” is in itself a good example of why no one of any standing takes any of this seriously.

By: cwallen

cwallen — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:22:19 +0000

this doofus (mr biscardi) has been around forever, always affecting the legit claims and researchers. When will most of the world wake up and change this Barnum’s ability to make a buck?

By: T.Richman

T.Richman — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:49:05 +0000

Sickening. There will always be those that spoil the whole basket.

By: Alligator

Alligator — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:41:51 +0000

Hmmm. Could words Sing Sing or Leavenworth have application here? The hoax/fraud diod over state lines and tons of money does indeed seem to have been the objective.

By: graybear

graybear — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:57:11 +0000

If Biscardi is ever listed as a featured speaker at a future Bigfoot convention, how much money do you think could be made by someone with the spoiled vegetables and rotten eggs concession?

By: airforce47

airforce47 — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:49:53 +0000

Greetings,

I think Loren, WOLVES-TALON and cliffhanger042002 have made good points. Steve’s documentation is good and he has proved he is an able researcher before this.

This report restores some of Steve’s credibility in my mind and reaffirms my belief that he and I shared a common trait that neither of us will do again. Being naive about TB or anyone else making any claims about having BF evidence.

In the future anyone making such claims will need to produce said evidence for scientific forensic examination to determine the legitimacy of their claims. If they fail to produce it then they’re subject to the label of hoaxer.

Larry Lesh