Comments on: What Are Bigfoot Mothers To Do?

By: graybear

graybear — Mon, 14 May 2007 16:22:58 +0000

A couple of points about the men versus women and children viewing opportunities that have been overlooked are fairly simple ones; we males have a distinct testosterone odor and we are almost always larger, sometimes much larger than women and children. It may be that sas males also have the testosterone odor and are loners, avoided by the women and children except at mating time (rather like orangutans, which are sort of related to gigantopithecus). The same goes for size. My wife is 5 foot nothing, I’m 6 foot 1. Almost everything sees her as less threatening than me (a mistake, actually). It could also be pointed out that, among the Native American tribes, the men were the hunters while the women were the agriculturists. Since the sas and the Indians were here together for many thousands of years this gender based difference could be well known among the sas.

By: alanborky

alanborky — Mon, 14 May 2007 05:44:40 +0000

Ooh, Loren, I’d never thought of that before - I’d always thought of the reports about little hairy guys as being reports of a quite distinct pygmoid species, a sort of SaSQUASHED, if you will.

But you do see what this whimsically rendered little piece means, don’t you?

You not only look like Father Christmas on holiday in Miami, but you even think like him when he’s back at work at the North Pole!

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Mon, 14 May 2007 00:02:32 +0000

That’s funny Fuzzy. I’m a musician/songwriter, artist/film maker and my wife does the books.

By: fuzzy

fuzzy — Sun, 13 May 2007 21:40:04 +0000

ddh1969 - “To take this even broader, it seems that women and children are more sensitive/attractive to all things unknown/paranormal. What are we men missing?”

What we are missing is an easy connection to right-brain thinking! Most men are left-brained, rational, analytical, controlling and aggressive, while women and children (before they are overwhelmed by sociological restrictions) lean to a more open-minded, creative, right-brained, non-threatening frame of mind.

Perhaps sensitive creatures, attuned to nature’s vibrations, can feel it?

By: captiannemo

captiannemo — Sun, 13 May 2007 21:09:28 +0000

This may also be the way the Sasquatch young are taught the ways of the humans.

The harder lessons will come later.

By: ddh1969

ddh1969 — Sun, 13 May 2007 20:52:31 +0000

DWA…

To take this even broader, it seems that women and children are more sensitive/attractive to all things unknown/paranormal. What are we men missing? Are we too aggressive in our approach? Do things of this nature just naturally feel threatened by males? Maybe we need to get more women (and children?) involved in the field. Of course, I wouldn’t want to put anyone in danger unwillingly or intentionally. I guess it’s just a catch 22 if ever their was one.

This is a great theory to discuss and something that is too often skipped or overlooked in much BF discussions.

Thanks

By: daledrinnon

daledrinnon — Sun, 13 May 2007 18:50:29 +0000

I have a good recent report of a woman witness who was allowed to approach closely to a mother ‘Bigfoot’ and her young–but it includes some very good description of certain anatomical details which tell me that it was a more human-like creature than the OhMah or Sasquatch, including the tracks.

There was a recent report also of a male mountaineer that was able to approach a female Yeti and her young on Mount Everest, but she was also described in more human terms (evidently gathering yak dung for fuel and stashing it in a bag she was carrying) This report is suspect and I had not heard it repeated since the first telling by the witness, who wanted to ski down one side of Mt. Everest.

By: DWA

DWA — Sun, 13 May 2007 17:33:48 +0000

Sounds plausible to me.

Any firsthand accounts of this kind of interaction?

It appears that women and children have the inside track on up close and personal with the sasquatch. And sas juveniles seem to get pretty free rein pretty early on in life.

I’d say it’s VERY plausible.