Comments on: Take A Walk With Bigfoot

By: Tumblty

Tumblty — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:37:54 +0000

I just noticed the right thumb. Looks like it is huge.

By: Norm Al

Norm Al — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:04:19 +0000

Deejay

Of course the film is a fake!!! There are not giant apes roaming North America. It is biologically so implausible that when coupled with the lack of skeletal or other physical evidence we can conclude it is impossible.

So, this is a very, very huge dude in the best damn ape suit ever made by anybody before or since. Right?

It’s tough to be a rational person sometimes, but when the evidence keeps pointing me to an irrational explanation, it’s my only solace.

Anyway, if there appeared to be a baby on this thingy’s back, surely Patterson and/or Gimlin would have noticed it at the time. I see nothing on the back of the guy in the costume, except of course really realistic looking fur and musculature.

Man, that is a really, really good costume that very, very huge dude wore.

By: YourPTR!

YourPTR! — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:20:52 +0000

An amazing video that has stood the test of time.

By: deejay

deejay — Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:51:46 +0000

I know it’s an unpopular opinion around these parts, but I still think the footage is fake. And a baby on its back? Give me a break, you’re seeing things.

By: rayrich

rayrich — Mon, 03 Sep 2007 05:47:28 +0000

Having had encounters of my own, this video always brings chills. Not only the mass of this female (which is probably 200 pounds less than an average male in the area), but also the pulled quad muscle along with the baby on the upper back, which actually moves away from the mother a tad with about 35 seconds left in the video. Check it out, you can see the newborn’s head in that frame. No hoaxer would have the imagination or anatomical education to fabricate this film, especially the clowns who claimed to have hoaxed it. Those guys couldn’t get out of their own way. WOW! I’ve seen the film a thousand times and am still in awe.

By: Lyndon

Lyndon — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:44:29 +0000

Perhaps the most significant thing about this footage [40 years-time does fly, doesnt it] is that there hasnt been any footage filmed that is comparable to it since 1967.

Absolutely spot on. Many have tried though. There seems to be a new attempt almost on a weekly basis on You Tube etc.

By: john5

john5 — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:55:58 +0000

Wow! Really well done. Fitting music too. Good thing Roger was not using a digital camera at the time!

By: Bob K.

Bob K. — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:16:58 +0000

Perhaps the most significant thing about this footage [40 years-time does fly, doesnt it] is that there hasnt been any footage filmed that is comparable to it since 1967. I hope and pray that this year upcoming will be the year that either a Sas’ makes a mistake and comes out of hiding long enough for a major, multiple eye-witness event involving well known and respected citizens, and/or a film or two that rivals Pattersons. In a recent exchange of cross-country ‘e’ mails to my brother back east(who, by the way, is quickly becoming a student of the Big Fella, perhaps spurred on by my move to the PNW and his recent visit to the area), I remarked-with some sadness-that it was such a shame that a creature like this, which is probably the king of beasts/top of the food chain here in North America, is so almost completely ignored by most of those in the mainstream scientific community. Lets also hope and pray that this trend reverses as well. The more I learn about this animal, all I can think about is what a momentous addition to our understanding of the natural world it will be when this creature is finally catalogued alongside the other magnificent creatures that we share this world with.

By: bill green

bill green — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:50:39 +0000

hey loren wow very informative interesting article about bigfoot. thanks bill green