<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New PA Footage Discovered: Is It Bigfoot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AliKill</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54860</link>
		<dc:creator>AliKill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 06:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54860</guid>
		<description>Oh no!! it's a farmer :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no!! it&#8217;s a farmer <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54796</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54796</guid>
		<description>bamsbocce:  

"This seems a bit short sighted DWA…I never claimed that this was BF…but a better transfer than a hanging bedsheet and a handheld camcorder can make a clearer picture and then more options for digital manipulation."

This is my point:  digiital manipulation gets you nowhere if the original has no data in it.

There seems to be a lot of thinking out there that you can pull truth from nothing.  Look at the Patterson/Gimlin film.  There is NO QUESTION WHAT THAT IS.  It’s a bipedal animal, probably a primate and an ape from the looks of it, that analysis by experts, when it has pronounced a conclusion, has pronounced only one:  that’s an authentic unlisted animal.  (There is no such thing as a skeptical analysis of that film.  At least I have yet to see one.)  If that were one of your cousins you would know which one; if it were any known animal you’d ID it immediately.  And it looks like no ape suit known; the figure's proportions are subtly but definitely non-human; and no shred of evidence for a fake has surfaced.

And what do we have in terms of confirmation after 42 years?  Nothing.

Why does anyone think crap like this will move us toward an answer if science won’t even search for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bamsbocce:  </p>
<p>&#8220;This seems a bit short sighted DWA…I never claimed that this was BF…but a better transfer than a hanging bedsheet and a handheld camcorder can make a clearer picture and then more options for digital manipulation.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is my point:  digiital manipulation gets you nowhere if the original has no data in it.</p>
<p>There seems to be a lot of thinking out there that you can pull truth from nothing.  Look at the Patterson/Gimlin film.  There is NO QUESTION WHAT THAT IS.  It’s a bipedal animal, probably a primate and an ape from the looks of it, that analysis by experts, when it has pronounced a conclusion, has pronounced only one:  that’s an authentic unlisted animal.  (There is no such thing as a skeptical analysis of that film.  At least I have yet to see one.)  If that were one of your cousins you would know which one; if it were any known animal you’d ID it immediately.  And it looks like no ape suit known; the figure&#8217;s proportions are subtly but definitely non-human; and no shred of evidence for a fake has surfaced.</p>
<p>And what do we have in terms of confirmation after 42 years?  Nothing.</p>
<p>Why does anyone think crap like this will move us toward an answer if science won’t even search for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youcantryreachingme</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54794</link>
		<dc:creator>youcantryreachingme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54794</guid>
		<description>Answer is Yes! This will become known as the "ultimate blobsquatch footage for 2009".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer is Yes! This will become known as the &#8220;ultimate blobsquatch footage for 2009&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Y2J Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54793</link>
		<dc:creator>The Y2J Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54793</guid>
		<description>I agree I see a split second outline of the collar. Honestly I am not even sure the original people planned it too be bigfoot. Heck I'm not all that sure it was even sold as a bigfoot film. Due too the fact it has the same year and found the same way as the michigan dogman I am betting its for an upcoming film. Maybe even about the michigan dogman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree I see a split second outline of the collar. Honestly I am not even sure the original people planned it too be bigfoot. Heck I&#8217;m not all that sure it was even sold as a bigfoot film. Due too the fact it has the same year and found the same way as the michigan dogman I am betting its for an upcoming film. Maybe even about the michigan dogman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Kaco</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Kaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54791</guid>
		<description>Kids Kids play nice lol It is sketchy at best but I give it 2 thumbs up for the nostalgic value and 2 thumbs shakin' hard for all around BLOBSQUATCH! Nice! ;) 
Keep up the good work Loren.
Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids Kids play nice lol It is sketchy at best but I give it 2 thumbs up for the nostalgic value and 2 thumbs shakin&#8217; hard for all around BLOBSQUATCH! Nice! <img src='http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Keep up the good work Loren.<br />
Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamsbocce</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54786</link>
		<dc:creator>bamsbocce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54786</guid>
		<description>DWA responds: 

"Actually, that’s not the problem. The problem is: nothing can be done with this, period."

This seems a bit short sighted DWA...I never claimed that this was BF...but a better transfer than a hanging bedsheet and a handheld camcorder can make a clearer picture and then more options for digital manipulation.

We might as well use the tools availabe to disprove (or prove) grainy, shakey video claiming to contain BF footage. As it stands in the video above, your right, not much more can be done, but let a professional transfer the original and we might be able see something...my guess, a large zipper down the back. 

I was really trying to be realistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DWA responds: </p>
<p>&#8220;Actually, that’s not the problem. The problem is: nothing can be done with this, period.&#8221;</p>
<p>This seems a bit short sighted DWA&#8230;I never claimed that this was BF&#8230;but a better transfer than a hanging bedsheet and a handheld camcorder can make a clearer picture and then more options for digital manipulation.</p>
<p>We might as well use the tools availabe to disprove (or prove) grainy, shakey video claiming to contain BF footage. As it stands in the video above, your right, not much more can be done, but let a professional transfer the original and we might be able see something&#8230;my guess, a large zipper down the back. </p>
<p>I was really trying to be realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RocKiteman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54780</link>
		<dc:creator>RocKiteman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54780</guid>
		<description>MK DAVIS!  CALLING MK DAVIS!!  YOUR SERVICES ARE REQUIRED AT CRYPTOMUNDO!!!  

;~)°</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK DAVIS!  CALLING MK DAVIS!!  YOUR SERVICES ARE REQUIRED AT CRYPTOMUNDO!!!  </p>
<p>;~)°</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: planettom</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54778</link>
		<dc:creator>planettom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54778</guid>
		<description>I think I see Jimmy Hoffa making a crop circle?  Nah, in all seriousness, it's just too hard to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I see Jimmy Hoffa making a crop circle?  Nah, in all seriousness, it&#8217;s just too hard to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sschaper</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54776</link>
		<dc:creator>sschaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54776</guid>
		<description>I can't even make out the corn in this clip. 

Imagining the corn though, the behavior of coming out of the field, going over a few rows, and going back in, is that of a contract corn detasseler, a job which I have done myself. So even though the individual appears pretty stocky in this clip where you can't really see anything, I'm voting for a human corn detassler.

The trail will have grown mighty cold since 1977.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even make out the corn in this clip. </p>
<p>Imagining the corn though, the behavior of coming out of the field, going over a few rows, and going back in, is that of a contract corn detasseler, a job which I have done myself. So even though the individual appears pretty stocky in this clip where you can&#8217;t really see anything, I&#8217;m voting for a human corn detassler.</p>
<p>The trail will have grown mighty cold since 1977.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swnoel</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-pa77/#comment-54775</link>
		<dc:creator>swnoel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=16434#comment-54775</guid>
		<description>Looks like someone stomping down corn stalks for the fun of it.

I see nothing unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like someone stomping down corn stalks for the fun of it.</p>
<p>I see nothing unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
