Comments on: New PA Footage Discovered: Is It Bigfoot?

By: Joisey Gene

Joisey Gene — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:03:01 +0000

Other than the fact that The figure is Moving,and I find the film entertaining,there is not much more to say. I do agree with a previous comment in that the subject’s movements seem ” a little over the Top”. But who knows maybe our hairy friend used to be a vaudevillian. Easy now, I’m just kidding. : ) I do feel the film is interesting in that it is hard to say with conviction whether it’s a fraud,or the “Real McCoy”.
BTW. does anyone know where that phrase comes from? (“The Real MacKoy”) or is it McCoy?

By: AliKill

AliKill — Sat, 30 May 2009 06:01:05 +0000

Oh no!! it’s a farmer

By: DWA

DWA — Thu, 28 May 2009 12:06:53 +0000

bamsbocce:

“This seems a bit short sighted DWA…I never claimed that this was BF…but a better transfer than a hanging bedsheet and a handheld camcorder can make a clearer picture and then more options for digital manipulation.”

This is my point: digiital manipulation gets you nowhere if the original has no data in it.

There seems to be a lot of thinking out there that you can pull truth from nothing. Look at the Patterson/Gimlin film. There is NO QUESTION WHAT THAT IS. It’s a bipedal animal, probably a primate and an ape from the looks of it, that analysis by experts, when it has pronounced a conclusion, has pronounced only one: that’s an authentic unlisted animal. (There is no such thing as a skeptical analysis of that film. At least I have yet to see one.) If that were one of your cousins you would know which one; if it were any known animal you’d ID it immediately. And it looks like no ape suit known; the figure’s proportions are subtly but definitely non-human; and no shred of evidence for a fake has surfaced.

And what do we have in terms of confirmation after 42 years? Nothing.

Why does anyone think crap like this will move us toward an answer if science won’t even search for that?

By: youcantryreachingme

youcantryreachingme — Thu, 28 May 2009 09:50:25 +0000

Answer is Yes! This will become known as the “ultimate blobsquatch footage for 2009″.

By: The Y2J Problem

The Y2J Problem — Thu, 28 May 2009 06:24:03 +0000

I agree I see a split second outline of the collar. Honestly I am not even sure the original people planned it too be bigfoot. Heck I’m not all that sure it was even sold as a bigfoot film. Due too the fact it has the same year and found the same way as the michigan dogman I am betting its for an upcoming film. Maybe even about the michigan dogman.

By: Dr Kaco

Dr Kaco — Thu, 28 May 2009 03:34:21 +0000

Kids Kids play nice lol It is sketchy at best but I give it 2 thumbs up for the nostalgic value and 2 thumbs shakin’ hard for all around BLOBSQUATCH! Nice!
Keep up the good work Loren.
Peace!

By: bamsbocce

bamsbocce — Thu, 28 May 2009 00:28:30 +0000

DWA responds:

“Actually, that’s not the problem. The problem is: nothing can be done with this, period.”

This seems a bit short sighted DWA…I never claimed that this was BF…but a better transfer than a hanging bedsheet and a handheld camcorder can make a clearer picture and then more options for digital manipulation.

We might as well use the tools availabe to disprove (or prove) grainy, shakey video claiming to contain BF footage. As it stands in the video above, your right, not much more can be done, but let a professional transfer the original and we might be able see something…my guess, a large zipper down the back.

I was really trying to be realistic.

By: RocKiteman

RocKiteman — Wed, 27 May 2009 21:37:55 +0000

MK DAVIS! CALLING MK DAVIS!! YOUR SERVICES ARE REQUIRED AT CRYPTOMUNDO!!!

;~)°

By: planettom

planettom — Wed, 27 May 2009 21:14:19 +0000

I think I see Jimmy Hoffa making a crop circle? Nah, in all seriousness, it’s just too hard to tell.

By: sschaper

sschaper — Wed, 27 May 2009 20:16:59 +0000

I can’t even make out the corn in this clip.

Imagining the corn though, the behavior of coming out of the field, going over a few rows, and going back in, is that of a contract corn detasseler, a job which I have done myself. So even though the individual appears pretty stocky in this clip where you can’t really see anything, I’m voting for a human corn detassler.

The trail will have grown mighty cold since 1977.