Comments on: New Bigfoot Film Leaks

By: John L. Johnsen

John L. Johnsen — Sat, 17 May 2008 20:21:29 +0000

To Loren and all,

The apparent facts as I have them now are this:

Yes. There is yet another turn in the incident at Bluff Creek. However, unless all of us involved (me, MK, Scott, et al) want to be served our heads on a platter to a judge for libel, we cannot YET go public with this theory. However, as it is sometimes his way, M.K. let some related teasers out to the wrong crowd, someone hyped it to the max and plastered it on the internet. So, in the eyes of the observer, M.K. looks like someone just baiting the public and I, because I produced the last film, have been taken to be a carnival barker…setting up a media circus to sell tickets, or DVDs.

This is the second time that, in my opinion, M.K. has chosen to make the wrong decision concerning his ongoing study of the film, prematurely releasing information. You will remember, I dove in head first when the last incident happened only to try to calm the hornet’s nest…but all I accomplished was to also get stung.

So, apparently, Davis never made these statements as they appeared on the net. He did, as I stated, apparently tell someone something and the rest is history. But, he never said there would be anything mind blowing being released at Keating’s conference.

So, all of this was for naught, it seems. As I said earlier, it depends upon Davis whether or not he and I collaborate on an update. As it stands now I feel it might not happen.

All I and everyone else can do is wait and see. That is just the way it is.

John Johnsen

By: cryptidsrus

cryptidsrus — Sat, 17 May 2008 20:13:42 +0000

Interesting turn of events, here…

I’m willing to wait a bit longer. Though as other people have stated here, this is really nothing new.

By: Artist

Artist — Sat, 17 May 2008 13:27:08 +0000

AND NOW, FOR ANYTHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT…!!!

By: graybear

graybear — Fri, 16 May 2008 23:43:14 +0000

I’m willing to wait another 30 hours or so, but not another two years. “M.K.,” whether he means to or not is well on the way to becoming the new “K.K.” Do we really need another one?

By: swnoel

swnoel — Fri, 16 May 2008 21:43:17 +0000

I think what they saying is that the stills have been “DOCTORED”
LOL what a surprise… it’s hard to believe!! ;-o

By: jayman

jayman — Fri, 16 May 2008 20:15:29 +0000

Let’s just be patient for another 30 hours, ok?

By: sausage1

sausage1 — Fri, 16 May 2008 19:05:45 +0000

I have absolutely no idea what any of this means.

By: Tamarack

Tamarack — Fri, 16 May 2008 18:37:54 +0000

It might mean that the copies were darkened, in other words they might have tried to do something in the copying process to make the copies come out a little darker - trying to correct the exposure. We are left to guess - is this talking about the 2nd generation film strips that were made?

As far as the “large format color slides taken from the master film” — in the late 60’s or early 70’s the the photographic term “large format” was usually speaking of 120 roll film which produced 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 inch slides or larger. The only real advantage here would be if they actually were taken from the original film strip and would be 2nd generation copies.

I agree with all of the “wait and see” comments. M.K. should at least make some kind of statement as to why. Otherwise he is digging himself a deep hole. Would it take a year or two for legal/copyright reasons?

By: red_pill_junkie

red_pill_junkie — Fri, 16 May 2008 17:40:26 +0000

The Patterson film “darkened”? I was always under the impression that the film was too “over exposed” (more light than dark) because Patterson wasn’t that experienced with handling a camera? Comments?

By: chrisandclauida2

chrisandclauida2 — Fri, 16 May 2008 17:38:16 +0000

“look here we found it” then as the crowd gathers to pay their quarter for the side show they find out that “it” isnt anything more than another crock waiting to be force feed down their throats. then the real “it” isnt going to be ready for a couple years.

me thinks someone cries wolf