Comments on: Shooting Incident At Bluff Creek?

By: Two Elks

Two Elks — Fri, 23 May 2008 21:06:34 +0000

If this beast was shot, it must have been with a BB gun!

By: imandos

imandos — Thu, 22 May 2008 23:24:02 +0000

Has anyone looked for a nearby grassy knoll, from which a second shooter could have shot?

Best

By: PhotoExpert

PhotoExpert — Thu, 22 May 2008 17:52:17 +0000

Hmmm, who do I believe? Who do I believe, M. K. Davis or Bob Gimlin? Hmmm, Bob was there.
Bob is a man of integrity. M. K. Davis was not there. What about his integrity in light of recent claims?

I going and sticking with Bob Gimlin! Any one else?

By: mrbf2006

mrbf2006 — Thu, 22 May 2008 16:01:05 +0000

Again, all of this is speculation, folks. No one is saying all of this is fact, and I do not see where anyone said that Bob Gimlin was the one doing the shooting. It seems that certain parties are the ones speculating that Gimlin was the one that allegedly did the shooting. Nowhere will you see me say (or quote) that Gimlin did any shooting, or even allegedly did any shooting. Just remember, folks, those of us who were privvy to this information from the conference are not saying this information is true.

By: shumway10973

shumway10973 — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:22:11 +0000

Why doesn’t this guy just stick to what is on the film footage? A tall, hairy…something walking away, looks back and then enters the tree line and is gone. Unless there is footage never before released that he has gotten his hands on. Massacre–don’t you need a large number of victims for there to be a massacre?
massacre |ˈmasikər|noun
an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people : the attack was described as a cold-blooded massacre | she says he is an accomplice to massacre.
• informal a heavy defeat of a sports team or contestant.
verb [ trans. ]
deliberately and violently kill (a large number of people). See note at kill .
• informal inflict a heavy defeat on (a sports team or contestant).
ORIGIN late 16th cent.: from French, of unknown origin.

We have as of yet to publicly capture a good photo of one, let alone be able to slaughter a large number in order for the events to be called a massacre. Of course, if they did shoot Patti and had brought the body back, they probably would have thought twice before releasing any film footage. After all there’s no sign of aggression. Even at that time there would probably be problems for patterson and gimli. Besides 2 gunshots usually makes the animal look your direction. I’ve done that deer hunting to get the buck to move its head so I could see if it was legal or not. Unless he has footage never before seen with patti “jumping” or showing any amounts of pain, I do not see the characteristic signs of anyone (man or animal) getting shot. The “victim” will either jump or jerk in reaction to the “sting” or they will just fall down dead. Either way, there would be physical evidence on Patti in the way she is moving.