Things-in-the-woods- I agree. I don’t agree with him, but Silvereagle has never been outright rude to me or hostile even when I may have been towards him. He at least tries to support his ideas without resorting to name calling. I commend him for that and I feel bad that I have been snippy a few times with him. This site is great in that most here are level headed.

If it’s 1979. Oh, it isn’t.

My first exposure to the sas was in National Wildlife Magazine, not in Argosy, True, or “The Legend of Boggy Creek.” I’ve never gotten far enough into the personalities surrounding this issue to even know who this guy was before I logged in here. I’m interested in someone telling me what the animal is, and in theories that make sense. I’d be actively trying to solve it myself, but there seem to be more than enough trying to do that. I’m satisfied with plausibility, and more than happy to leave the big guy alone.

And since EB doesn’t seem to be contributing significantly to the understanding of the animal, I think I know why.

But now I know a fun fact about him, and to keep my phone number to myself.

Paranoid? MOI?

Really just wanted to reiterate (some of) what elsanto said-

I personally don’t believe a word of what silvereagle says, but he always seems polite to me (often more polite than i am to him), and i appreciate that. I think that is one of the real strengths of this site.

And Spoon Nose- What is your point?

What are you majoring in, if I might ask?

2. One of your questions is the answer.

3. Approach it from the other end, DWA. I didn’t hear it, but I get the gist. You on the other hand have not been a Becky-watcher like some of us since, oh, 1978.

4. No, that’s not what I meant.

5. A threat? Are you nuts? A little less paranoia, please.

I was referring to Becky’s famous tendency to call anyone whose phone number he can get his hands on, day and night. Any number that might appear on this thread is almost certain to get a complimentary phone call. At 2am. This goes back, oh, thirty years.

1. Do you know who “you guys” even are? Do you have any idea how long anyone here has “been around” this topic?

2. Regarding Beckjord, what should we be talking about? If it doesn’t relate to what he thinks about the sasquatch, should any of us care? Why should we talk about him? Is getting personal what we should be doing?

3. “You’d appreciate the irony of the events that apparently unfolded during this podcast.” OK, given that you didn’t hear it (hence, I presume, the “apparently”), how do you know what we would “appreciate”?

4. This sounds like a discussion of the events of the broadcast, not a “referendum on paranormal bigfoot”. Although, yeah, we’d love to stop talking about that until somebody can come up with evidence.

5. Phone numbers? Given that this sounds like, um, a threat, how many of us would be THAT stupid, mmmm?

Instead, this becomes another referendum on “paranormal bigfoot”.

You guys are pretty new to the Bigfoot world, aren’t you? Put your phone number in this thread and you’ll soon have a lot of relevant info to talk about.

EB did what he does best since he knows it all , no one else should be heard.

I prefer the real science research and debate rather than kids shouting just to make a point.

To bad EB may be right but with his foot-in-mouth it is hard to tell.