Posted by: Loren Coleman on May 23rd, 2010
Things appear to go in cycles.
The Montauk Monster received so much publicity in 2008, it was inevitable that more washed-up carcasses would get their own share of media moments and minutes.
Although the Montauk Monster most assuredly turned out to be a raccoon, in the months that followed, more (briefly) unexplained decaying bodies turned up in the New York, the UK, Alaska, Panama, and elsewhere to befuddle the press.
The animals were discovered to be everything from marine mammals to an unfortunate sloth.
This year’s first candidate to be compared to the Montauk Monster, of course, has been the Bald Beast of KI, or the Kitchenuhmaykoosib monster (also called “Omajinaakoos,” “Big Trout Lake Monster,” and “The Ugly One”).
It was a dead animal (almost 12 inches or 30 centimeters long) that was discovered and photographed on May 8, 2010 by two female nurses and their dog in a creek on or near Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug First Nation, Ontario.
Some elders have said it is a creature called oomajinakoos (ugly one), the appearance of which is said to be a sign of bad luck.
Beyond the unrealistic speculation that it was a relative of Ogopogo, Nessie, or even a baby Sasquatch, the more logical thinking has produced a mundane answer to this brief mystery. At first, thoughts moved in the direction of a bear cub, a muskrat, or an otter. But recent indications point to the animal having been a rather commonplace species, a mink.
The American mink, Neovison vison, are found throughout North America, in Canada and the United States of America. They are dark-colored, semi-aquatic, carnivorous mammals of the family Mustelidae, which also includes the weasels and the otters.
The well-known silky soft fur of a mink, when wet, can take on an even more intense glossy appearance. The head of a mink would look similar to that of an otter. The key are the feet, which are webbed in otter and unwebbed in mink.
The American mink and its skull.
While some individuals writing to Cryptomundo have suggested the mink species specifically as the answer, let me quote from the opinion of an authority consulted by Forgetomori, via biologist Maria Guimarães, who shared the thoughts of James L. Patton, Curator and Professor Emeritus, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California: “[The] mystery critter looks more like a mink than an otter to me (longer fingers, without any evidence of webbing). It clearly was dead in the water for a prolonged period, hence the defurred face and head, and somewhat swollen appearance….If anyone had bothered to look at the teeth, the identification would have been easy, but….”
As Patton, Forgetomori, and all of us have noted, identification in such cases are difficult from web-posted photos, when more secure positive identification could have been obtained with an actual body. But we sometimes have to work with what we have. In the case of the Bald Beast of KI, once again, the actual carcass has disappeared. From what is available, the photographs a reportedly foot-long dead body pulled from a creek in Ontario, it appears to have been a dead mink.