Comments on: “Beast of Balbirnie” Cast Update

By: CryptidHuntr

CryptidHuntr — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:36:08 +0000

They look like normal leopard prints to me. It’s hard to tell with the just the pictures though. They could have used plaster instead of chewing gum. Plaster works MUCH better then gum.

By: CryptoInformant

CryptoInformant — Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:11:55 +0000

CHEWING GUM! This reminds me of when those fake tracks were found at Loch Ness, back in the 30s, except those were plaster. This is also kind of like the So-No-NO-Ma Bigfoot video, they use something cheap so the details won’t show. Of course, chewing gum may just have been what was there, so was the material used.

By: MountDesertIslander

MountDesertIslander — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 22:04:51 +0000

They should not have used chewing gum to make the cast. Plaster works much better.

By: CryptoInformant

CryptoInformant — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:39:23 +0000

Actually, if you look closely, it matches NONE of those, but is CLOSEST TO LEOPARD.

By: jjames1

jjames1 — Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:29:46 +0000

The cast just looks like a big blob to me. I’d agree with Paul Westwood–there’s no way you can tell what left those tracks from those pictures alone.