As far as history goes, the bigfoot massacre as originally alleged by MK Davis and joined in on by a widely dispersed group of paid sleeper cell type members, some of who had demonstrated the same behavior prior to that point, was a carefully orchestrated scam from the getgo. I watched MK give is first public unveiling and watched him take quantum leaps in logic, that all originated from him removing the other two primary colors of green and blue colors from a PG photo. That photo manipulation then left everthing including a water pool, with a red tint, which he triumphantly interpreted as blood being everywhere. And he even worked in some sckizsy type allegation of femanine products in the PG photo from Bluff Creek. (key the twilight zone music) MK in essence, purported that he could to chemical analysis with his color manipulation. Using that same unproven technique, I was able to remove red and green colors from the photo, and turn that same water pool into a pool filled with blue cheese. Thus, proving that MK’s original logic was quite flawed, which then completely discredited every quantum leap he made after that point.

The other sleeper cell type incident mentioned, where many big names were also attempted to be revealed as frauds with one clean swath, originated from some tightly wound gal from Florida, who has since completely disappeared off of the rubber chicken circuit. Her sudden disappearance appeared to primarily be due to her being immediately outed as a “sleeper cell”, because she had no basis in her logic, but was simply attempting to destroy people on the west coast.

I have heard the local sleeper cell person state that he was attempting to be the last man standing in bigfoot research, by destroying everyone else. He helps put them out of business and then keeps them from getting jobs by claiming to potential employers that he is talking to them about doing public speaking, when no such discussion ever took place. He is still working his magic as far as I know. I know that he works for people who have the finances to own the latest eavesdropping equipment that keys off of always on cell phone microphones that everyone carries. And they use either the GPS capability or the triangulation capability of cell phone towers, to determine where secret research sites are located. So there are a lot of researchers out there who return to their favorite site, only to see that all of the trees are cut down. So the logging industry works with the eavesdropping group. The eavesdropping group has a name that shall not be mentioned here, but is in every State, and whose members pay at least $1000 per year to stay. Consequently, they have a big war chest to manipulate the legal system, harass researchers and even have them killed if they believe that they can get away with it. They appeared to have already tried a couple of times with me. So discrediting evidence is not just a school yard game.

As far as the photo above is concerned, the hair appears to be too scraggly to be the even length fur that black bears seem to sport. Which means that it is hair in the photo, and not fur. The second clue is that black bears tails are not very long at all, and do not extend over the top of the rump, and then do not dangle free for perhaps 12 inches. The alleged poop is also not obvious to me at all. Consequently, the photo remains compelling for me.

Yes, I guess all BF’s urinate or deficate out of their left arm. I guess conspiracy theorists throw out all credible evidence, all credible analysis, all interviews of the witnesses that were actually there. I guess they throw out all rational evidence that goes against their “beliefs” which they call theory.

Conspiracy theorists like you get it wrong all the time. The Jacobs photo did discredit to itself. Unfortunately, I was not involved with any discredit to that photo. The photo did that to itself. Reports with that photo show bear cubs in the frames prior to that photo being taken. But if you include those photos with the Jacobs photo, everyone will know it is a bear with cubs. So those photos taken seconds prior to the Jacobs photo are excluded. For conspiracy theorists to be correct, they must exclude truth, facts, and evidence. The Jacobs photo brings discredit to itself.

But you go ahead and keep excluding the facts so that every bear you see is a BF. Yep, that is the way to do it. Everybody else is wrong and you are right. Hey, you might even be able to get on the show “Finding BF” where everything they hear and see is a “Squatch”.

And actually blazmeister, you are incorrect. Photographs do prove some things and disprove others. They are legal proof in courts of law across our great nation. Good photographs prove things. Bad photographs, faked photographs, and blobsquatches prove nothing. I have lost count of the number of erroneous statements you have made in your post. For me, your statements are a bit kooky. Not to say that you are a bit crazy or a whack job. I am not saying that. I am saying, that when you make blanket and bizarre statements of “sleeper cells”, well, you need to explain that and back it up with facts and names. Otherwise, it does sound crazy.

I am not sure where I lost you or lost count on your erroneous statements, but I think it was around where you mentioned the bloody Bluff Creek incident. Your statement was rather confusing. Are you saying a massacre DID or DID NOT happenat Bluff Creek? I’d like to know your opinion on that. Your answer might be a litmus test to whether you need professional therapy or not.

Good luck with your BF conspiracy theories! And when the salmon run in Alaska, you can get some great bear photos, I mean, BF photos to share with your conspiracy theorist friends. You know, you stated photographs prove nothing. LOL

So, I guess according to your own test of my hypothesis, my hypothesis is proven correct, even by your own standards of proof? Or if you do not want to take the evidence at face value or even consider my opinion, there are numerous other opinions that you can choose from. that this is definitely a momma bear with it’s cub. Richard, it is OK to be wrong every once in while. But wolverine? Oh my!

Tyler H–I just wanted to give a quick nod of approval on your posts here in this thread. Excellent job!!! And I think you are correct, those that see a BF, see it the way you described they perceived it. Pareidolia is such an interesting psychological topic. I also think you did an excellent job of investigating the photo further. You know what Tyler? Even after you presented all the facts, along with the photo evidence of it not being a BF, and your common sense approach, some here will still say it is a BF. They have selective memory or selective hearing. Even if all the evidence says it is a bear with a cub, some will still say BF or wolverine. LOL

Tyler, I really like the way you review evidence and connect it with the photographic evidence. I was actually going to finish what I started and you beat me to it. Anytime you want to work together on analysis of a photo, let me know!

cryptokellie–You made several awesome points in this thread. You are correct when you talked about their summer fur and their legs. Many people assume bears have short stumpy legs, but as you pointed out, not true! Excellent points that many do not consider when evaluating the evidence at hand.

wbp– I am not quite sure what you are looking at. Did you see the enhanced photo? We are not talking about the bluish flowers. We are talking about the liquid stream coming from the orifice on the animal. I don’t know what you are looking at. Perhaps you have a small screen and can not see it clearly. But look again, and the stream becomes evident. Most people see it, so I did not see the need to highlight it in color marker. Please look again.

I conversed with the owner of the game cam.

Probably because it takes too much effort to shop several pictures to make them look like a real series of shots.