Well, yes and no. Obviously, no one can say with 100% certainty that something like Bigfoot couldn’t possibly exist in Great Britain – by definition you can’t “prove” a negative – but when considering the LIKELIHOOD of a large apelike creature existing alongside man, undiscovered, in a largely populated/agricultural setting, I think we need to throw in the towel.

Yes, there are plenty of reports of Black Dogs, A.B.C.’s and even Wolves in GB, but they are all animals that are know to exist, elsewhere, and can – at least to some degree of plausibility – be explained by escaped/unlawfully released “pets.”

Bigfoot has not been “proven” to exist ANYWHERE (although its existence in the Pacific Northwest and Asia, given the remoteness of those areas, seems much more likely) and, to the best of my knowledge, there are no reported escapees from private zoos/collections to account for Bigfoot’s appearance in GB!

Consider this as well, Ice Age megafauna lived in GB up until approx 14,000 yrs ago. Suppose I, and others had reported seeing either Mammoths, Wooly Rhinoceri, or Cave Bears? Would you be willing to make the same case for either/any of them, given that any surviving individuals would have to be “sparsely-populated, long-ranging, nocturnal type(s)?” An absurd comparison, you say? Well at least there is a proven fossil history for the above creatures in GB!

While Bigfoot and its ilk may exist somewhere in the world, the reported sightings in GB – spirit and psychic occurrences notwithstanding – can pretty-much be attributed to made-up stories, hoaxes and mis-identifications.

Let me put it this way: if you gave me $500,000.00 to mount an expedition to find Bigfoot, I wouldn’t spend a dollar of it in Great Britain.

I’m not going to tell the characteristics that make it phony. There are far more qualified researchers who can tell you what they are. But as a fan of bigfoot–not a researcher–I know what they are. The purveyor of this obviously does not.