Comments on: Anatomy of Melissa Hovey Bigfoot Picture by David Claerr

By: shmargin

shmargin — Thu, 08 Mar 2012 04:55:40 +0000

It looks like its too high up to be a game, like conorsean said. And if bigfoot wasnt standing there it looks like the camera would be 3 feet away from tree branches. And, without me being a horticulture expert, that looks like the kind of tree you would have in your yard.

All that plus the suit looks fake. I’ve never seen a bigfoot before, but I would imagine the hair wouldnt be so thin, its cold up here in the PNW.

By: conorsean

conorsean — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:52:12 +0000

Why is the “game cam” so high in the air? Since bigfoot is 7-10′ tall it seems odd to have it that high. Wouldn’t someone put it to where they don’t need a step ladder to reach it? Or is that a mini bigfoot?

By: RedLandsBigfoot

RedLandsBigfoot — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:50:46 +0000

Nobody knows what muscles bigfoot has–there has never been a body to study–

By: PoeticsOfBigfoot

PoeticsOfBigfoot — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:30:13 +0000

Well said, Loren, Oh my captain! Well said.

By: Brothermidnight

Brothermidnight — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:58:35 +0000

I dont understand why anybody is even discussing the anatomy of a costume. Look at the anatomy of the statue of David, its anatomy is so human but that makes it nothing more then a well crafted piece of art .Nobody has ever looked a a photograph of David and said wow I think that might be a real person because of it has muscles. This reminds me of when I was a kid and one of my friends was convinced that it was a real Bigfoot in the movie Harry and the Hendersons.

By: czcole

czcole — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:35:34 +0000

Considering that “bigfoot ” is posing in front of a loquat tree, this would have to be in someones back yard.

By: paul_r

paul_r — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:04:40 +0000

“One question: Unlike almost every trailcam and gamecam photograph you have ever seen (which are taken in clearings), don’t you think it is funny this “game cam Sasquatch” photograph appears to have been taken in the middle of the forest?”

I’m not so sure you could get such a clear picture without being staged. The camera would have to be arranged for the perfect shot ahead of time imo. I think the first flash of the camera would spook the subject for good.

Honestly I would love for this to be real but I agree the over analisys is fully underway.

By: bigfoots

bigfoots — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:43:32 +0000

@ Loren…
after 4 years now MH has realized it wasn’t a game cam and the photo was taken via 35mm camera with zoom lens..
so its not from a game cam..
so yeah…i would love to hear the logistics involved in how that was done..
shady to say the least..

By: Loren Coleman

Loren Coleman — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:31:28 +0000

PoeticsOfBigfoot, I’ll just post a corrected variation on what I’ve said at Guy’s site about this, with no disrespect to Guy or the artist for taking this to the extreme:

I’m sorry but when we, as a science, begin talking about the detailed anatomy of a species projected from a photograph of a Bigfoot suit allegedly used in the movie Clawed, I think we may have gone too far.

One question: Unlike almost every trailcam and gamecam photograph you have ever seen (which are taken in clearings), don’t you think it is funny this “game cam Sasquatch” photograph appears to have been taken in the middle of the forest?

By: bigfoots

bigfoots — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:23:01 +0000

this is just getting silly now..
so let me get this straight…
somehow having big trapezius muscles makes it legit? like a costume can not have big trapezius muscles? lol…roflmao..
this is about as un-scientific as it gets as far as analyses goes..
hilarious..