Comments on: Update: Wisconsin Bigfoot Video

By: OKBFfan

OKBFfan — Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:23:49 +0000

It appears that Mr. Kulls didnt get a chance to investigate this video. He explains on his site:

“There have been numerous blogs about this picture originally found on Youtube.com where this interesting bit of film was found.

What we do know is that the videographer, did NOT respond to detailed inquiries, (although did respond to initial inquiries).

The videographer did NOT call Squatchdetective.com Founder Steve Kulls, to be personally interviewed while in the S-D was in Wisconsin.

However we did find the following anomalies with the film:

1. The “creature” never acknowledges the videographer.

2. The “creature” appears to have great difficulty walking in the area, yet the videographer stated it moved with great speed.

3. The “creature” appears to have a hard time breaking a branch despite knowing these creatures can easily snap a 4 inch diameter tree.

Conclusion:

Due to lack of details other than location, we initially feel the film is a hoax. “

By: gregmc

gregmc — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:35:02 +0000

i live about 20 miles from st. croix falls. i fish there on a regular basis and at night i’ve heard some strange stuff. howls and such. i distinctly remember one time in particular (around 1 a.m.) when i swear something big was walking a straight line back and forth in the tree line. i mean it sounded like a human stepping etc. i was shore fishing for waly’s and it went on for 10 or 15 minutes. it was not a bear, of this i am sure. strange stuff crosses your mind in these situations and it got to the point were i was so nervous i packed up fast and jogged away. was it sasquatch? probably not. but it did cross my mind. there have been sitings of sasquatch in this area before (grantsburg WI) (rice lake WI). it’s a very well covered area, forests etc. after seeing this story, i can believe it may be true. the thought of sasquatch in this area is indeed fascinating.

By: Jeremy_Wells

Jeremy_Wells — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:14:41 +0000

the more I look at this… well the quality is poor on youtube… but the one thing that keeps perplexing me is how he zooms in to where you can get a good view of the shaggy coat for about half a second, then he zooms out to where you can see nothing…
suspicious that, and yeah, it does look like the wookie suit

By: jsmith

jsmith — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:23:38 +0000

Hi All,

If this is a fake I think these guys are good as I am very impressed with this. I do agree with simian though that fakers can get better the more they learn how people like Craig catch them out.

The thing that impressed me most in this video is the movement of the object. Very natural compared to other fake vids we have seen. The only two downsides right now: The fact that it was on youtube residing with many other fake bigfoot videos and the fact that we seem to be in the bigfoot silly season part of the year when a lot of these kinds of things are released.

Thanks for sharing Craig and good luck to Steve on his mission.

By: Dudlow

Dudlow — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:40:26 +0000

I can’t watch the video due to the limitations of my old Ford Model-T computer. But morphogically speaking, the object in the still photograph at the page top (above) appears to be within naturalistic range for squatchy. (The second photo above does nothing for me.) The proportions of the upper body/head/arms/shoulders are absolutely acceptable and in conformity with my personal experience. Too bad it’s a digital photo of poor quality - as such it must remain a tantalizing blobsquatch. If I was a betting man, and the photo was a bit clearer, my money would be on this one.
Dudlow

By: sschaper

sschaper — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:44:06 +0000

Wow, that’s not too far from here! Could an animal like that travel 90 miles? Yah, I bet it could.

By: BCORN

BCORN — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:50:17 +0000

Like others posting on this forum, I have seen numerous Bigfoot videos over the years. These videos of some dark figure in the bushes usually come across as fake to me. If someone didn’t have a convincing costume then this is how they would do it. I don’t think the Patterson film has any competition in the foreseeable future. The only way film footage is going to be convincing is to film one of these creatures in the open.

By: rayrich

rayrich — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:14:40 +0000

If that was the real thing that cameraman would have p—d his pants and ran like a bat out of hell.

By: simian1

simian1 — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:45:18 +0000

the problem with posting past hoaxers methods is that new attempts to “get one over on us” will probably get better. As some other poster said before, video is going to be an unreliable method to get a definitive answer on the Big Guy’s existence unless it is a clear shot where we can see an actual tall, broad, bipedal, hairy creature interacting in its environment without shaky cameras or blurry trees.

By: I wanna see one

I wanna see one — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:34:21 +0000

I must say there ARE some intriguing frames in this one, I swear I can see a head-on face shot early in the 00:14 area of the tape and another face shot, but with eyeshine, at 00:51, this second one is easier to see as the video seems to stop on it easier than the earlier one.
Both of these frames seem to show something that looks like what one would expect to see on the face of a bigfoot.
Also, there is a frame where he is bending over, breaking the branch, that looks as if one can see his, ah, testicular encasement, shall we say? (light colored orbs) hanging down and swinging a bit as he is throwing his weight around. If this is a fake, they have thought of everything.