<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Werewolf or Sasquatch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19219</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19219</guid>
		<description>hee hee.

Hey, folks, look, maybe the sas IS a fourth-dimension, shape-shifting time-traveler who drops in occasionally to

(1) and of course most important, warn us against Destroying Our World and

(2) hang out with Elvis.

I mean, I'm not a scientist and I don't eat bean curd.  So what would I know?

I'd prefer to just go with William of Occam on this one:  he's a big ape, a bipedal one, and if he has extraordinary abilities, they're so in the way a bear's, or a deer's, or a gorilla's are.  In other words, better suited to the wild life than ours.  And nothing more.  Who needs more?  (You want really preternatural, whooo-WHOOOO-oooo-special-effects superpowers?  Try bats.)

It's not that "Nobody even seems to think of the idea that maybe we can’t kill Sasquatch, etc."  It's that we did; we laughed; and we went back to hoping there's a big ape out there, just another but really cool animal, you know?  I think the gun-toters that don't shoot are thinking one of two things:  (1) I can't shoot that, I'd never forgive myself; or (2) this is way too cool to shoot; or OK, a (3)rd thing:  If I miss a vital area with my first shot, (s)he will leave me in several, un-reunitable parts.

Why do people keep having to invest this animal with Supernatural Astral Plane Pyramid Power Invincibility?  Isn't the sas cool enough just being a 1,000-pound bipedal ape, showing Omnipotent Modern Science up for the hear-no-evil-see-no-evil idiocy it frequently is just by being that?

The answer?  No.  He's WAY cooler than cool enough.  He's just a big ape.  That's COOLER than cool.  And maybe with all this Pyramid Power tabloid crapola that keeps getting spun about him, science will never bother to look, and we won't disturb him ever, at all.

Kinda reassuring, actually.

Eat up, Sas baby.  Enjoy Your Ohio!  The next deer's on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hee hee.</p>
<p>Hey, folks, look, maybe the sas IS a fourth-dimension, shape-shifting time-traveler who drops in occasionally to</p>
<p>(1) and of course most important, warn us against Destroying Our World and</p>
<p>(2) hang out with Elvis.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m not a scientist and I don&#8217;t eat bean curd.  So what would I know?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer to just go with William of Occam on this one:  he&#8217;s a big ape, a bipedal one, and if he has extraordinary abilities, they&#8217;re so in the way a bear&#8217;s, or a deer&#8217;s, or a gorilla&#8217;s are.  In other words, better suited to the wild life than ours.  And nothing more.  Who needs more?  (You want really preternatural, whooo-WHOOOO-oooo-special-effects superpowers?  Try bats.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that &#8220;Nobody even seems to think of the idea that maybe we can’t kill Sasquatch, etc.&#8221;  It&#8217;s that we did; we laughed; and we went back to hoping there&#8217;s a big ape out there, just another but really cool animal, you know?  I think the gun-toters that don&#8217;t shoot are thinking one of two things:  (1) I can&#8217;t shoot that, I&#8217;d never forgive myself; or (2) this is way too cool to shoot; or OK, a (3)rd thing:  If I miss a vital area with my first shot, (s)he will leave me in several, un-reunitable parts.</p>
<p>Why do people keep having to invest this animal with Supernatural Astral Plane Pyramid Power Invincibility?  Isn&#8217;t the sas cool enough just being a 1,000-pound bipedal ape, showing Omnipotent Modern Science up for the hear-no-evil-see-no-evil idiocy it frequently is just by being that?</p>
<p>The answer?  No.  He&#8217;s WAY cooler than cool enough.  He&#8217;s just a big ape.  That&#8217;s COOLER than cool.  And maybe with all this Pyramid Power tabloid crapola that keeps getting spun about him, science will never bother to look, and we won&#8217;t disturb him ever, at all.</p>
<p>Kinda reassuring, actually.</p>
<p>Eat up, Sas baby.  Enjoy Your Ohio!  The next deer&#8217;s on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rillo777</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19218</link>
		<dc:creator>Rillo777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19218</guid>
		<description>What if Bigfoot doesn't live in these areas of Ohio but is drawn there? It ocurred to me that there are several creatures that migrate to certain areas to mate. Salmon and certain species of eels come to mind. What if the Bigfoot is also travelling to ancient homelands for that purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if Bigfoot doesn&#8217;t live in these areas of Ohio but is drawn there? It ocurred to me that there are several creatures that migrate to certain areas to mate. Salmon and certain species of eels come to mind. What if the Bigfoot is also travelling to ancient homelands for that purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archer1945</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19217</link>
		<dc:creator>archer1945</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19217</guid>
		<description>I always get a kick out of people saying how easy it would be to kill a Sasquatch or any of its foreign relatives. A 270 or 30'06 is completely capable of dropping a 1000lb animal, not to mention the lowly 30'30. A 50lb longbow or recurve will kill an elk or moose with no trouble at all.

Nobody even seems to think of the idea that maybe we can't kill Sasquatch, etc. Everyone one thinks of them as nothing more than a Great Primate that is below homo sapiens on the intelligence level because no one has found any signs of what we think is needed for civilization.

Has anybody taken into consideration the idea that maybe Sas, and relatives, could be a million years or more, older than homo sap and their intelligence took a completely different path? What if they developed completely in tune with nature and possess abilities we can't even dream of. There are many reports of hunters meeting them but for some reason they seem to forget they are armed. What if they were being told they were unarmed? Sophisticated traps have been set for them with no luck. How easy would it be to trap something that is so in tune with its surroundings that it would know if a pebble were out of place? Or it could read the mind of the trapper and know where the trap is. Bigfoot could be as far beyond homo sapiens as we are beyond australopithecus, maybe even further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always get a kick out of people saying how easy it would be to kill a Sasquatch or any of its foreign relatives. A 270 or 30&#8242;06 is completely capable of dropping a 1000lb animal, not to mention the lowly 30&#8242;30. A 50lb longbow or recurve will kill an elk or moose with no trouble at all.</p>
<p>Nobody even seems to think of the idea that maybe we can&#8217;t kill Sasquatch, etc. Everyone one thinks of them as nothing more than a Great Primate that is below homo sapiens on the intelligence level because no one has found any signs of what we think is needed for civilization.</p>
<p>Has anybody taken into consideration the idea that maybe Sas, and relatives, could be a million years or more, older than homo sap and their intelligence took a completely different path? What if they developed completely in tune with nature and possess abilities we can&#8217;t even dream of. There are many reports of hunters meeting them but for some reason they seem to forget they are armed. What if they were being told they were unarmed? Sophisticated traps have been set for them with no luck. How easy would it be to trap something that is so in tune with its surroundings that it would know if a pebble were out of place? Or it could read the mind of the trapper and know where the trap is. Bigfoot could be as far beyond homo sapiens as we are beyond australopithecus, maybe even further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19216</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19216</guid>
		<description>"I think it would be better off if it were never recognized as real. It seems that everything humans touch leads to some sort of destruction."

That, steveg, probably is my bottom line on the sasquatch.

I'd love nothing better than to Know It's There.  But that requires science getting its grubby paws into the mix.  And the natural world never escapes science unscathed.

What really kills me, though, is that mainstream science doesn't believe there to be any hard evidence.  I have to wonder what they're smokin'.  If a plaster cast of a cougar track is pretty good evidence that that's a cougar, you'd think that a plaster sas cast -- with features experts have declared to be from a primate unknown to science -- would be a good reason to take a harder look.

Wouldn't you...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think it would be better off if it were never recognized as real. It seems that everything humans touch leads to some sort of destruction.&#8221;</p>
<p>That, steveg, probably is my bottom line on the sasquatch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love nothing better than to Know It&#8217;s There.  But that requires science getting its grubby paws into the mix.  And the natural world never escapes science unscathed.</p>
<p>What really kills me, though, is that mainstream science doesn&#8217;t believe there to be any hard evidence.  I have to wonder what they&#8217;re smokin&#8217;.  If a plaster cast of a cougar track is pretty good evidence that that&#8217;s a cougar, you&#8217;d think that a plaster sas cast &#8212; with features experts have declared to be from a primate unknown to science &#8212; would be a good reason to take a harder look.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveg3474</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19215</link>
		<dc:creator>steveg3474</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19215</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I don't want to shoot bigfoot.  I don't need a dead one to believe in it.  I think it would be better off if it were never recognized as real.  It seems that everything humans touch leads to some sort of destruction.  I was just trying to point out how relativley easy it would be to kill one.  I think someone who manages to shoot one will do it as a snap decision.  They won't be thinking of the consequences.  Then again they can always claim self defense.  I'm not even 100% that they are even living physical animals and not some other dimensional creation.  I've read too many accounts of creatures dissapearing in front of witnesses, tracks ending in the middle of fields and creatures being shot repeatedly to no effect etc.  I myself would never shoot one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I don&#8217;t want to shoot bigfoot.  I don&#8217;t need a dead one to believe in it.  I think it would be better off if it were never recognized as real.  It seems that everything humans touch leads to some sort of destruction.  I was just trying to point out how relativley easy it would be to kill one.  I think someone who manages to shoot one will do it as a snap decision.  They won&#8217;t be thinking of the consequences.  Then again they can always claim self defense.  I&#8217;m not even 100% that they are even living physical animals and not some other dimensional creation.  I&#8217;ve read too many accounts of creatures dissapearing in front of witnesses, tracks ending in the middle of fields and creatures being shot repeatedly to no effect etc.  I myself would never shoot one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19214</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19214</guid>
		<description>I probably should add here that cutting off a bigfoot's hand or foot or head or something and carrying it out (help yourself, bud) is probably not smart.

We have a movie of sas, ferpetesake.  Footprint casts from all over, certified by print experts as being from a primate of unknown origin.  Vocal recordings, getting the same seal of approval from bioacoustical experts.

And STILL science doesn't recognize the sas.

Nope, you gotta give 'em the whole thing.  And then face justice.

Fire away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably should add here that cutting off a bigfoot&#8217;s hand or foot or head or something and carrying it out (help yourself, bud) is probably not smart.</p>
<p>We have a movie of sas, ferpetesake.  Footprint casts from all over, certified by print experts as being from a primate of unknown origin.  Vocal recordings, getting the same seal of approval from bioacoustical experts.</p>
<p>And STILL science doesn&#8217;t recognize the sas.</p>
<p>Nope, you gotta give &#8216;em the whole thing.  And then face justice.</p>
<p>Fire away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19213</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19213</guid>
		<description>I would be willing to bet a year's salary against anyone taking one of these guys down with one arrow (which is all you would get, I'd think).

And yes, that's including all other considerations, especially the murder charges, but also the poaching consideration.  If you kill a bigfoot, you have at the very least done that.

Hunting regs say what you CAN hunt.  More accurately:  they tell you, categorically, that you are FORBIDDEN TO HUNT, period.  And then they lay down the exceptions.  Of which there are many, as any hunter knows.

If it's mentioned in the regs as something you can hunt, well, in season, as specified in the regs, you can.  Anything else, you CANNOT.  Killing an unknown, undocumented species is, therefore, prima facie illegal.  Bigfoot is never in season, precisely because hunting regulations do not mention him at all.

That walking sack of money would leave your hands about the moment you unleashed the arrow.  If you kill sas (and not the other way around, good luck to you), you won't pick up a cent of that money.  Which is a shame, because poaching is expensive, and the mediocre amount of money you MIGHT get, well, might have helped there.

A poacher who kills a deer takes the bounty home in secret, if he isn't caught.  That's all he was looking for.  And yeah, then there are the bear galllbladder guys who sell to other shady characters.  But it's easier to hide a gallbladder than a 1,000-pound dead ape.  The walking sack of money HAS to go public for the killer to make a cent.

Sorry, poacher.  Hope it ain't murderer, bud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be willing to bet a year&#8217;s salary against anyone taking one of these guys down with one arrow (which is all you would get, I&#8217;d think).</p>
<p>And yes, that&#8217;s including all other considerations, especially the murder charges, but also the poaching consideration.  If you kill a bigfoot, you have at the very least done that.</p>
<p>Hunting regs say what you CAN hunt.  More accurately:  they tell you, categorically, that you are FORBIDDEN TO HUNT, period.  And then they lay down the exceptions.  Of which there are many, as any hunter knows.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s mentioned in the regs as something you can hunt, well, in season, as specified in the regs, you can.  Anything else, you CANNOT.  Killing an unknown, undocumented species is, therefore, prima facie illegal.  Bigfoot is never in season, precisely because hunting regulations do not mention him at all.</p>
<p>That walking sack of money would leave your hands about the moment you unleashed the arrow.  If you kill sas (and not the other way around, good luck to you), you won&#8217;t pick up a cent of that money.  Which is a shame, because poaching is expensive, and the mediocre amount of money you MIGHT get, well, might have helped there.</p>
<p>A poacher who kills a deer takes the bounty home in secret, if he isn&#8217;t caught.  That&#8217;s all he was looking for.  And yeah, then there are the bear galllbladder guys who sell to other shady characters.  But it&#8217;s easier to hide a gallbladder than a 1,000-pound dead ape.  The walking sack of money HAS to go public for the killer to make a cent.</p>
<p>Sorry, poacher.  Hope it ain&#8217;t murderer, bud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveg3474</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19212</link>
		<dc:creator>steveg3474</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19212</guid>
		<description>You would not even need a gun to put a sasquatch down.  An arrow would work just fine.  People have taken polar bears, grizzly bears and even elephants with a bow.  It's all about shot placement.  A deer will bleed out in about 20 seconds when shot in the vitals with a bow.  Now I would not argue that if you are in the woods and bigfoot is coming at you you probably would be too scared to shoot.  Thinking that no one would shoot one is not quite right.  If you could produce a body you are talking about a big financial payoff.  Some people see bigfoot as a big walking sack of money.  Your only worry would be a DNA test stating bigfoot is 99.9% human and then facing murder charges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would not even need a gun to put a sasquatch down.  An arrow would work just fine.  People have taken polar bears, grizzly bears and even elephants with a bow.  It&#8217;s all about shot placement.  A deer will bleed out in about 20 seconds when shot in the vitals with a bow.  Now I would not argue that if you are in the woods and bigfoot is coming at you you probably would be too scared to shoot.  Thinking that no one would shoot one is not quite right.  If you could produce a body you are talking about a big financial payoff.  Some people see bigfoot as a big walking sack of money.  Your only worry would be a DNA test stating bigfoot is 99.9% human and then facing murder charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudlow</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19211</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19211</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't be too quick to entirely dismiss all of these accounts out of hand. The Wisconsin and Michigan 'Beast of Bray Road' reports come to mind, as do a number of other dog-faced Sasquatch reports from varying regions throughout the Americas - even the Province of Quebec now has its own such report. Delphos is certainly not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be too quick to entirely dismiss all of these accounts out of hand. The Wisconsin and Michigan &#8216;Beast of Bray Road&#8217; reports come to mind, as do a number of other dog-faced Sasquatch reports from varying regions throughout the Americas - even the Province of Quebec now has its own such report. Delphos is certainly not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Michaels</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/werewolf/#comment-19210</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Michaels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/american-werewolf-or-sasquatch/#comment-19210</guid>
		<description>On Nov 7th election day, I intend to cast a write in vote for Bigfoot. If he's elected, he may be willing to come out of the shadows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Nov 7th election day, I intend to cast a write in vote for Bigfoot. If he&#8217;s elected, he may be willing to come out of the shadows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
