<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wag the Chupacabras?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy_Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy_Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19380</guid>
		<description>But, popular as they are, we still can't get the name chupacabras right...
(that is Chupacabra'S', with an S, sucker of goats)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, popular as they are, we still can&#8217;t get the name chupacabras right&#8230;<br />
(that is Chupacabra&#8217;S', with an S, sucker of goats)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLibrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19379</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLibrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19379</guid>
		<description>This is the second day in a row that we've seen an AZ newspaper article that cites Wikipedia as a source! What kind of self respecting newspaper would use a source like that and call it research? Is this common for articles, or do they just not care about research integrity due to the topic. Totally disgusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second day in a row that we&#8217;ve seen an AZ newspaper article that cites Wikipedia as a source! What kind of self respecting newspaper would use a source like that and call it research? Is this common for articles, or do they just not care about research integrity due to the topic. Totally disgusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolouren</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolouren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19378</guid>
		<description>It is truly interesting this Chupacabra story, but what kind of animal is able (except Vampire Bat) to live on sucking blood? I know there are many bizarre things on this planet, but some of this are only the product of the human fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is truly interesting this Chupacabra story, but what kind of animal is able (except Vampire Bat) to live on sucking blood? I know there are many bizarre things on this planet, but some of this are only the product of the human fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzy</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19377</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19377</guid>
		<description>Amazing how time blurs memories into lights and shadows, even for the serious researchers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how time blurs memories into lights and shadows, even for the serious researchers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lastensugle</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19376</link>
		<dc:creator>lastensugle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19376</guid>
		<description>Isn't that X-Files episode like ten years old? Of course, I don't know what you regard as the "recent past", but in my opinion when it comes to popular culture, ten years are a lifetime! I must admit that I'm quite skeptic when it comes to the existence of our goat-sucking friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that X-Files episode like ten years old? Of course, I don&#8217;t know what you regard as the &#8220;recent past&#8221;, but in my opinion when it comes to popular culture, ten years are a lifetime! I must admit that I&#8217;m quite skeptic when it comes to the existence of our goat-sucking friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raptorial</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19375</link>
		<dc:creator>Raptorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/wag-the-chupacabras/#comment-19375</guid>
		<description>I recently created a poll to see what the general populace thought was the most likely cryptid to exist. Chupacabras got the same amount of votes as bigfoot. That is very sad when you think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently created a poll to see what the general populace thought was the most likely cryptid to exist. Chupacabras got the same amount of votes as bigfoot. That is very sad when you think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
