Comments on: The Foot of Bigfoot?

By: mystery_man

mystery_man — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:29:01 +0000

Well now everyone just bear with me here. I am really amazed that so many supposedly trained professionals took so long to come to the conclusion that it was a bear. I gues some of the examiners have to get back to the bear basics. Oh Ok, I’ll go now…..

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:00:30 +0000

I’m backing away from this one…foot by foot by foot…

By: fredfacker

fredfacker — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:57:09 +0000

Oh kittenz, that pun was un-bear-able.

By: kittenz

kittenz — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:26:14 +0000

Yes, I suppose you could say that the office of the Virginia medical examiner was “em-bear-assed ” this time! (Stop with the throwing things. I know it’s a horrible pun lol!)

By: silvereagle

silvereagle — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:23:18 +0000

Must be something in the water:
-Spotsylvania foot, 8 1/2″ long, last joint removed = bear
-Biscardi hand, smaller than adult man, last joint removed, unavailable for identification but likely bear, monkey or black market gorilla
-Biscardi foot-lower leg- knee assembly, lower leg too short compared to length of foot, unavailable for identification
-Biscardi skeleton, leg proportioned to less than 6 ft man, appears to be human, unavailable for further identification
-Memorial Day footage, 5.3 ft tall subject ran at half the speed of human runner, filmed too far away for positive identification, complete film footage unavailable for further study
-Pancake eating bigfoot, subject similar in size and contour as person leaving pancakes, subject appeared in about same time for person leaving pancakes to circle around and approach pancakes from different direction, subject sat with back to camera to reduce chances of identification

Whew, what a week!

Is there anything real out there?

Blobsquatchski maybe?

By: Mnynames

Mnynames — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:06:58 +0000

I’m glad they’re keeping it for training purposes…apparently somebody noticed that their medical examiner couldn’t tell the difference between a bear foot and that of an ape.

By: joppa

joppa — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:36:18 +0000

Way to cryptomundo folks! Most of the posters here determined it was a bare bear foot. They should ask here first.

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:27:30 +0000

“But primate experts around the country looked at the foot and decided it wasn’t an ape. That led to speculation that it belonged to Bigfoot.”

So Bigfoot’s not an ape?

BREAKTHROUGH! I knew this would be worth something.

Sheesh. Given that you have to start all over from square one with the public every time the big guy comes up, no wonder he isn’t documented yet.

Don’t you love that? Belonged to Bigfoot. To paraphrase George Clooney’s character in “Ocean’s Eleven”: Bigfoot called. He wants his foot back.