Comments on: Latest Update: Todd Standing and Sylvanic

By: j stewart

j stewart — Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:47:43 +0000

These look about as fake as a rubber costume in a freezer or a guy in a suit in California…….Smells real strong like a hoax…

By: anomalocaris

anomalocaris — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:52:21 +0000

The image C to C posted appeared to have been digitally altered, beginning with a photo of a lion, with the lower portion of the face added later. I wouldn’t have chosen a lion to begin with, for a very simple reason. Lions have fur. Apes have hair. Sylvanic claims to be dealing not only with apes, but specifically with hominid apes. So using something with fur to hoax the photos with makes it a dead giveaway to anyone with any experience with hominid apes (I have 17 years hands-on experience with them, which is why it immediately looked odd to me.)

By: sparklebug

sparklebug — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:09:00 +0000

The bigfoot in the freezer fiasco? what?!?! I’ll have to google that! My focus is more on the aquatic creatures but, I do find all of the Big Foot sightings to be fascinating!

By: paul_r

paul_r — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:54:22 +0000

I’m confused about why Steve Kulls should be taken with credibility after his history with Tom Biscardi; including the bigfoot in the freezer fiasco.

I guess this is the pot calling the kettle a hoaxer!

By: Pass

Pass — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:01:36 +0000

There’s more than a thousand people claim they have seen Bigfoot.

I suppose, at least one of them, could tell us if a Bigfoot looks like this!

Just wait to read: THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I SAW!

By: JMonkey

JMonkey — Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:12:10 +0000

Sadly, once he posts this video, if it is proven to be real, every hunter in the surrounding territory will probably be able to pick out the location. Too bad he believes that bringing other scientists and possibly the Canadian Wildlife Service in to see this rare animal, so that it can be proven and protected would be dangerous. Seems like the alternative will be just as bad.

I am confused by what he means when he says the animals dominated them. Were they physically abused, did the animals try to attack them, were they run off repeatedly. I am interested in finding out more on this subject.

Unfortunately it is the status quo to hold a big press release, and milk the attention for all its worth. In this case I think he may be taking it too far, especially with him refering to himself as the “foremost expert on bigfoot.” I am sure that many others have done just as much work if not more in this area. But I guess you can claim to be whatever you want, it just does not make it true. Other than that I will try to reserve my judgement for when the full video comes out.

By: Tacos_with_Chili

Tacos_with_Chili — Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:09:06 +0000

Honestly, I wouldn’t ignore this man. If it’s a hoax, It will be known. If it’s not a hoax, it will be known. Either way, it will be known as a hoax or legit. Ignoring this man will not make Bigfoot real. You’ll never know which male or female is telling the truth. How about you find the real Bigfoot and had took pictures of it or video taped it. You post it online. People start blabbing their mouths about “Ignore this person”. How would you feel if they start saying it’s a hoax and ignore you? If you keep ignoring a person for claiming the capture of Bigfoot by pictures, video or body, you’ll might regret it if he/she turns out to be legit.

By: Mïk

Mïk — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:03:13 +0000

Relax, Folks. No need to shout. Let the hoaxters hoax, just don’t get all caught up in the chaos. When the real thing comes along, and it will because there’s so many more people taking it seriously (and why there’s so many more hoaxes), the truth will be recognized. Even in the noise of the media, good evidence will prevail. Keep looking and ignore that man behind the curtain.

By: gridbug

gridbug — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:22:24 +0000

Agree that this does nothing to help our cause. If anything, fully vet the story and THEN post it, denouncing it as another attempt to hoax the BF community (which it clearly is). Just posting this story with a skeptical “maybe possibly could be” isn’t good enough, especially with the likes of Biscardi et al still prowling for camera time. Mainsteam media thrives on sensationalism and will jump on non-events such as this. And we all suffer.

By: Baron Von Doren

Baron Von Doren — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:27:20 +0000

Why give this guy more attention? This is the kind of thing that makes the whole of bigfoot research look ridiculous. The mainstream media seizes on this type of story because it’s so easy to make the subject seem foolish. Why not just let Sylvanic die and focus on actual research and evidence?