Comments on: Tasmanian Globster Footage Unearthed

By: Markus

Markus — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:58:26 +0000

Two pictures of the preserved tissue probably from Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery in Hobart (Pic 1, Pic 2). Another (lenghty) version of the above footage from Ross Harris.

By: Craig Woolheater

Craig Woolheater — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:32:04 +0000

springheeledjack, Posted on May 2, 2011. New Chinese Globster?

By: springheeledjack

springheeledjack — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:28:25 +0000

I wanna know just what makes it an unknown critter? Was it the hair and the fibrous flesh? Or something else? Until a tissue sample was tested, who knows. That’s the problem with globsters—they’re usually so decomposed that it’s hard to sort out what it might have been unless tested.

There was just a globster washed up on China’s shore…55 feet long and 4.5 tons…or did I miss that thread? I’ve been out of town–but saw it on MSNBC.

By: Sharmz

Sharmz — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:52:12 +0000

Tasmanian Devil?

By: Cryptoz

Cryptoz — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:15:25 +0000

It’s Trunko, if it’s not a hoax.

By: flame821

flame821 — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:50:43 +0000

I have to giggle, when they are using the axe on the flesh the announcer states “It’s a real man’s job” and they CLOSE UP on the fellow with the beard.

But boy, what a difference in how samples are collected. Bare hands, hatchets, plastic bag without a ‘ziploc’. We’ve come a long, long way since the 60′s and they thought they had it made compared to just 20 years prior. Wonder what our science and research will be like in the next 20 years?