You can clearly see the pant cuff and shoes this person is wearing, so those few of you that still want to give this video serious consideration worry me a little.

Please don’t include me with the rubes. I don’t fall for all that stuff, I am just tired if seeing it. I liked the video. To me it’s not just funny, but educational.

The only reason I still look at blobs, leafs and smudges is because with so many being posted these days, the odds are good that someday one may actually show something interesting. But since the person is sincere, I fear they may post it quietly, hoping it will be stumbled upon, because they are worried that if they publicize it they will be lumped in with all the bs artists out there.

@nopaosak,

I was just talking to a friend about how many out there forget that one of the steps of the scientific method is letting others look at your findings and see if they can validate or duplicate them. Back in the 60′s my father developed a theory in microbiology. He told me the hardest part wasn’t the discovery, but answering questions and defending it until it was accepted.

Aside – We need more debate teams in school. They would be great training for people with our interests.

Remember last year when a mountain lion was running through Chicago?

Bears and coyotes and mountain lions make their way into Metro areas all the time.

A pair of coyotes were in the park right across the street from my house a couple months ago. Kids were out there flying kites, riding their bikes and everything!

I agree with many here that the original looks WAY better than the new one.

Not to say it’s not a hoax either, but some pretty bad arguments here.

How many times have we heard about Bigfoot raiding dumpsters and trash cans right behind houses and businesses? Plenty.

Again, as I have said before…for all I know, Matt is completely sincere in his search for bigfoot. The issue is that while here and on camera he makes a lot of really bold claims and refuses to lend credence to those claims with evidence. He really does need a PR person to act as a filter. If someone only watched the show that airs and not any of these web exclusives (which are always different), then they see the same things I have been talking about here. Show after show we have bold claims with no proof. He has stated here and else where things that anyone using Google can see just aren’t so. He has backtracked or pulled complete 180s on things he has said. I know he will probably come here and just call me a liar,try to insult me and try to discredit me, but that just isn’t going to work as it isn’t my credibility that is in question.

So far on the show, every sighting they investigate has been easily shown that it could have been a human…yet we still hear them saying that they are sure it is a bigfoot. That is the issue at hand here.

As has been said before by me and others, the “Spokane Bigfoot” video could have easily been faked. They even showed just that on Finding Bigfoot, yet they still concluded that since it was of average human height, it must have been a juvenile bigfoot.Kahil Nettleton

Kahil,

Regarding your comment above. Matt states quite clearly in this Finding Bigfoot Web Exclusive, posted previously here at Cryptomundo, that it is either a misidentification of a human, or a hoax.

I think you make an excellent point. But I also say, it was one of the worse hoaxes I’ve seen in years. It didn’t even attempt to hide the fact it was a gaff. Now, the Gilesuit hoax, that was brilliant, and worthy of sideshow history.

Look at the location of the original video and think again.

Of course I am sure I will hear 7984729384789236489 explanations as to why it makes sense for a bigfoot to be in this urban location. There’s no convincing those who want to believe in something no matter what the evidence.