Comments on: Meldrum Makes Call On Bigfoot Track Find

By: Navman

Navman — Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:38:00 +0000

Interesting dig at Moneymaker and Co. from “Finding Bigfoot.” I’m not sure a Bigfoot would come within 100 miles of those folks with as much noise and commotion they make on the show.

By: Carumba

Carumba — Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:45:27 +0000

In past posts, I have referred to a photo my brother has of a likely BF footprint he discovered on the side of a logging road near Mt. Katahdin, Maine while nosing around in a swampy area while on vacation. The width of that footprint is abnormally wide, especially so in the toe area; so I believe the print in this article is human because it is so humanly narrow. My guess is the inordinate width of a BF foot is to accommodate a lot of weight and to help agility, balance, and speed over uneven terrain.

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:35:59 +0000

Yep, it just looks like his foot with the heel extended a little.
EASY to do. Or as Meldrum said; maybe a close relative of his-
like his slightly larger brother took their shoe off and made the print.
I’ve NEVER seen a purported bigfoot track with such a high arch.
I could make tracks like that all day long-my feet are quite similar.

By: fuzzy

fuzzy — Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:02:19 +0000

“Ditto”? Uh Oh!

By: red_pill_junkie

red_pill_junkie — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:12:38 +0000

Ditto on all 4 previous comments

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:41:23 +0000

Gotta go with the other comments here.

When I saw the last picture, I thought IT’S HIS FOOT!

The first photo said “badly pulled cast of a human foot” to me.

If it looks human, folks, it’s because it is.

That said, this is right on:

“It’s unfortunate,” he added. “You get these amateur ‘experts’ making silly pronouncements, and the skeptics use it as ammunition to discredit all the evidence that comes to light.”

One of the first indications that someone is unacquainted with sasquatch evidence is a statement that “there are so many hoaxes you just can’t be sure,” as if the wheat is hard to separate from the chaff. It isn’t.

By: lordoftheonionrings

lordoftheonionrings — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:38:33 +0000

When you are trying to pull off a hoax don’t include a picture as evidence that clearly shows that it is a hoax.

By: Zabo

Zabo — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:25:47 +0000

i think this comment say’s it all! the dude said “we might stretch the truth” and as far as the casting? you could chop robert’s left foot off. and it wouldn’t matter cause he has an exact duplicate of that foot in plaster! right? i don’t know about you, but i ain’t buying this story anytime soon. peace!

By: flame821

flame821 — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:19:16 +0000

He never should have posed with his foot compared to the casting. High arches, celtic toe and a marked decrease in toe length. It’s too close to be coincidental.