LOL – Living up to your name! If you are a site moderator I want to be clear, I wasn’t desiring a debate, rather simply the sources of that view….

did Airforce arrive at her/his conclusion based on information from a primary source, such as an authority or player in the event, or was it a conclusion arrived at more generally through reading secondary sources?

No debate, just a question.

Thanks Airforce in advance for answering and also Terry Censor for posting..

You make an incredible statement in your post:

“It seems that shooting one even if the DNA is human will be quasi-approved by the authorities until they’re accepted as a species.”

On who or what do you base this opinion? “Quasi-approved by the authorities” is a very big assumption, unless you know something we don’t?

What authorities?

Thanks in advance, nice post BBTY

This is a situation where MM and Loren are correct. My feeling is the same as MM’s. The entire situation has caused a review and discussion at levels where the subject hasn’t been addressed before and may very well lead to further advances.

However, Even if Justin’s actions are found valid and credible and Melba’s analysis is upheld it will not change the long range requirement that a specimen living or dead must be presented to science before the species will be accepted and classified.

High resolution photos can help and are useful for identification and location of specimens. It seems the TBRC is now out for a collection of a specimen by force along with Chester Moore. It seems that shooting one even if the DNA is human will be quasi-approved by the authorities until they’re accepted as a species.

I don’t approve of it but my approval is not required and I’m in a minority on this one.

There does appear to be a lot of action going on in the government behind the scenes. The most likely reason for this is the Wood Products Industry represents 7% of our GDP. The finding of the species will dictate some changes and they seem to be in the process of insuring those changes won’t bother their business models.

If I owned stock in the companies or worked in them I might be highly tempted to be involved but I’m not. Let the research go on until we find the truth and it’s in the woods somewhere. My best,

As far as I know, the “giant” skeletons found at Tell-es Sa’idiyeh near the Levant still have a journal article in the wings despite having been found I think in the 80′s. These skeletons I have heard have measured anywhere from over 6 feet to 7 feet (including two female skeletons around 7 feet high), found among an average of 5’3 or so, dating to the 12th century BC, and are possibly the remains of the Biblical Rephaim peoples. (Dr Johnathan Tubb is the excavator who found them. They thought at first with one find they found cow remains, until the legs connected to a human pelvis).

Likewise Giganotosaurus was found years before it became famous.

And then there is a scientist (Professor Jeffery Scwartz) at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh that is working on a replacement for Darwin’s theory that is not faith based (he is an agnostic, which is fitting since Darwin was too). The idea is that evolution can occur within one generation, due to a sleeper mutation, which lurks in a population of species until two parents carrying the gene necessary for the change have offspring. That will be a long way off in the wings.

+1

talk about anti-climatic..