Comments on: Photo of Russian Bigfoot?

By: emerson

emerson — Fri, 30 May 2008 11:56:05 +0000

Yep, it looks like a chimp walking upright.

By: cryptohunter

cryptohunter — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:55:10 +0000

Looks almost like a gray alien to me with the size of the head and arm length.

By: Bob Michaels

Bob Michaels — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:38:01 +0000

Could be a Relic communist Cryptid.

By: calash

calash — Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:19:12 +0000

Anything new on the photo?
Regards

By: mystery_man

mystery_man — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:40:41 +0000

Well, DWA, that is a curious omission, I’ll give you that. You’d think he might have seen some kind of movement or something.

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:08:30 +0000

mystery_man: I’ve had that landscape-photo thing happen.

I’d just shot my last frames of film in the Wind River Range, a few scenics. I’d put the camera away; didn’t want it clanking uselessly against my shoulder on the remaining five miles out. Then I saw a movement. It turned out to be a big bull moose, splashing his way right up the creek across the broad meadow from me. I watched him for some time, wishing I’d had the telephoto and a few more shots.

Wasn’t until I projected the slides that I saw him, down in the lower left corner of my last couple of shots.

But noticed how I have at least a bit of a story? How come there isn’t such a one here?

By: mystery_man

mystery_man — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:00:46 +0000

Springheeledjack, I think the problem is that this was apparently someone just doing landscape photos. The photographer didn’t realize what was on film until he had the photos developed. That could explain why more photos were not taken.

By: springheeledjack

springheeledjack — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:18:01 +0000

The biggest problem I have, in addition to what everyone else is homing in on, is that there is only one photo. At that range, it would have been in view for quite a while, and the photodog should have been able to fire off a half dozen or a whole roll of film and get it moving if indeed it was a real critter.

By: jchip

jchip — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:49:53 +0000

It looks like a stump to me, especially since it looks like there might be a log laying on the ground directly in front of it.

By: things-in-the-woods

things-in-the-woods — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:37:59 +0000

The more i look at this, the more dodgy it seems- i’m quite happy to be convinced that this is a manipulated photo. From the about the mid-thigh down the legs just don’t work for me.

Chimp photoshopped in at the wrong scale and badly messed up where its legs meet the foreground.