Comments on: The Future of Primarily Primates

By: Friends of Animals

Friends of Animals — Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:49:42 +0000

Be sure to visit Friends of Animals' blog, which always has the latest on this issue, including, for example, a Dec 2 open letter from the executive director of Primarily Primates.

By: busterggi

busterggi — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:46:30 +0000

PETA seems to put its ideology ahead of the actual welfare of animals. No matter how good their intentions may be, their actions leave a great deal to be desired.

By: cor2879

cor2879 — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:41:55 +0000

Amazing. Where’s the ‘Ethical Treatment of Animals’ in all of this I wonder?

By: SilverWing

SilverWing — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:08:15 +0000

PETA is well known for their animal disposal, attacks on legetimate rescues, over-zealous demonstrations, ect.

I personally wouldn’t trust their motive, or their word in any of this. And most certainly, they should not be in charge of Primarily Primates, considering they don’t know how to take care of animals (And who could say they’d know how, when they think all animals should be “Free”, and will kill some, and release other domestics into the wilderness, where they die slowly and painfully)

I personally think the case should be dropped, and instead of allowing an organization like Peta to step all over the Sanctuary, the court should work on getting them some help to fix whatever problems may really exist.

By: dharkheart

dharkheart — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:36:13 +0000

Hey, fuzzy, that’s the first thing that grabbed my attention, too.

PETA: ’nuff said.

By: Brindle

Brindle — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:50:04 +0000

In dog training circles, PETA is a well known NON-BENEVOLENT organization.

By: fuzzy

fuzzy — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:40:27 +0000

Friends of Animals President is named Priscilla Feral?