Comments on: New Ontario, Canada Bigfoot Video

By: Opalman

Opalman — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:40:40 +0000

@choppedlow
I don’t get it, about the bear-claw necklace. I have one I acquired the hard way. Its a full 4-1/4″ long. I inlayed it around the claw base with Lambina crystal opal and I’m proud to wear it anytime, anyplace. Must be some kind of joke …but I still don’t get it.

By: Opalman

Opalman — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:32:58 +0000

The black Lab is the clincher for me. I would be willing to bet a very large sum of money on the fact that the Dog is “on” . (but I don’t bet…LOL) Not only does the dog know something out there (he knows exactly where)—but he also knows he’s not sure if he wants to mess with it. The labs wrinkled brow, eyes and tongue to nose= (the last indicating ID uncertainty) @ 8:10:44 shows a very concerned dog. Might I remind those who may not know Labs that they are not easily intimidated by other animals. Also: this dog is definitely scared. Believe it! Also; the reporter is undoubtedly uneasy if not downright scared.
Agreed; although I believe the reporter is sincere, IMO; I don’t understand how all of his many “encounters” could all be sasquatch? Maybe though…perhaps onto a very hot area?

By: NASquatch

NASquatch — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:44:44 +0000

I for one just can’t seem to understand how no one is willing to call it what it is? I would think that if I had a $2400 dollar HD camcorder I would at least post it in HD! You would also think that people would notice the small stuff, like the date of the posted video. It says the 21st but on the video it says the 20th, you would also think people would catch little mistakes.”I never saw it clearly” was one and you would think people would know it’s a bear claw not a boars tusk. Are we so eager to see evidence that we are willing to accept anything? All one has to do is google the name and you will see hundreds of ads appear, everything from Viagra to Dating services. It’s just a guy that has figured out how to make money off of people using Youtube and that’s all. In my honest opinion, I think the real credible researchers are those who travel across the country and investigate sightings and encounters, those who put forth the effort to find the truth, not make it up as they go along. Ever wondered what happened to the trail cam someone sent him and why there are NO more pictures? Or what happened to his son and why is he not in the picture anymore, just use some common sense and stop sending your hard earned dollars to Canada.

By: mid tarsal

mid tarsal — Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:44:21 +0000

What’s interesting about this video? It’s brutal. If timbergiant is seeing and filming all of these bigfoots, a team of field researchers really need to go out to this area of Ontario and capture this thing once and for all. I’m skeptical of timbergiant.

By: whiteriverfisherman

whiteriverfisherman — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:30:16 +0000

There is good reason why there is no zoomed footage; my guess is because zoomed footage would reveal Sasquatch is actually Bob, Linda or whomever. This video shows nothing more than someone walking through the woods wearing a hood and that’s it. It could just as well be the GEICO Gecko for all we know. More of the same old crap.

By: RedLandsBigfoot

RedLandsBigfoot — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:18:23 +0000

Move along Cryptos nothing to be seen here…

By: scottyboysquatch

scottyboysquatch — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:05:24 +0000

Although the video is blurry, I get the feeling this guy saw something that spooked him. Whether or not it was a Sasquatch is another thing.

By: lees2cents

lees2cents — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 04:01:08 +0000

Why do they waste our time? Come up with something better and closer. As far as showing proof of a coned head, arched back and everything else…WHERE? I see a blur in the distance. If “zoomed in” it becomes a bigger blur.

By: DWA

DWA — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:38:56 +0000

mandors:

There is much more evidence for the orang pendek than you may think.

At least two Westerners with serious scientific cred claim to have seen one. The World Wildlife Fund sent a wildlife artist to Sumatra to listen to the descriptions of many native sighters, who came from a variety of locales and were not allowed to meet with one another beforehand, and draw the animal they were describing. He drew the same animal, over and over.

And I agree with you that there is so much evidence for sasquatch that, unless something absolutely unprecedented in human history is going on, scientific confirmation doesn’t amount to much more than a formality, albeit an important one. In fact at least one scientist has gone on record that the sasquatch is all but confirmed.

But I would never go so far as to call this great footage. There is something dark that is apparently moving at some point. But I would never vouch personally for it being anything in particular. You can’t even get an approximate idea how big it is.

By: bobhelferstay

bobhelferstay — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:09:56 +0000

It’s a blob. If someone didn’t tell me it was Bigfoot, I’d think it was just a guy in a fur coat.

The problem with video’s today is that it’s video, and no longer film. The more the blow it up, the more pixelated it becomes and harder to see.

I need something of the quality of the PG film, or at least the Freeman film to take it seriously. Anything like this that takes explaination I usually just throw out.