Comments on: New York Bigfoot Photographed

By: DeadOnArrival

DeadOnArrival — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:01:49 +0000

My biggest fear is bigfoot. I’m not afraid of snakes, spiders, ghosts or aliens but bigfoot scares the absolute crap out of me. I live just south of where this sighting was and when I heard about it on the news I was completely freaked! Then I found this website and saw the pictures and now know there is no bigfoot in Buffalo!! I can sleep again at night!

By: abominableskeptic

abominableskeptic — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:52:13 +0000

This hoax crap is getting sooooo old.

It’s 2006. State of the art cameras (digital), 35mm, etc. can be had everywhere. Even the disposable cameras take quality pics.

And we are to believe that this photo is real??? You can almost read the letters on the John Deere “Gator), but the “bigfoot” right next to it (in broad daylight)is a blurry shadow.

THIS IS A HOAX FOLKS.

By: Porkchop

Porkchop — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 21:15:49 +0000

Melissa

sorry to creep you out, that’s just a standard admonition I have to people who are more capable than others to see through the matrix…

By: Jeremy_Wells

Jeremy_Wells — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:56:49 +0000

To me, this looks like someone took a photo of a person and photoshopped solid black over it. There is just zero contrast in the “fur” as one would expect in a real creature. As someone else noted above, it looks like a big black hole.

By: English Boy

English Boy — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:03:15 +0000

That is a very bad fake, from the 3 clips i have seen it looks like someone doing the robot.

By: LordofShades

LordofShades — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:53:07 +0000

I feel very confident in saying that I believe this is a hoax. It disturbs me that hoaxers feel a need to inadvertently try to discredit cryptozoology. With todays technology in regards to photography and picture and video editing, it has become increasingly easier to perpetrate such hoaxes, not that this particular endeavour was in any way, shape or form sophisticated enough to even beg the question of,”Is this evidence?” It’s crudity bespeaks the smallmindedness prevalent in those poor unfortunates who feel the need to create attention at any cost. I have a sincere belief that someday, viable, irrefutable evidence will be collected, and therein create a greater challenge for hoaxers. With actual proof, or dare I hope, a specimen, we will have something concrete to measure hoaxes against and maybe even deter them in some way. JMHO, thanks all.

By: texasgirl

texasgirl — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:45:49 +0000

If it were real why would he only take one crap picture? He seems to be at a fairly close distance and it doesn’t appear to be running sooo fast that he couldn’t manage a couple of shots. Lame.

By: sausage1

sausage1 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 02:56:30 +0000

Yawn!

Why even bother showing this rubbish? It’s not even remotely well done. One really bad hoax might raise a few grins but more than that is just DULL!

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:23:00 +0000

I don’t think it looks that “Man Shaped”
I don’t think it’s real either. The thing I can’t stop thinking of from the pose it’s caught in, especially the arms; is a famous painting of a giant ground sloth by Charles R. Knight. If you took that and clipped the snout a little and made a silhouette of it, this would be it.

By: Ole Bub

Ole Bub — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:28:37 +0000

Good evening Bigfooters….

If folks would pop a few of these hoaxers with double ought buck or rock salt in the backside….I bet some of this crap would cease….JMHO

seeing is believing…

ole bub and the dawgs