Comments on: Update: New York Bigfoot Photos

By: shumway10973

shumway10973 — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 07:05:03 +0000

a dancing big foot, now I’ve seen it all. ok, an other tip is to work out a way for your elbows to go further down than normal human’s, but it would look better if they did that and then could still bend, good luck. this guy reminds me of an episode of MASH where hawkeye and trapper get gorilla suits in just as burns goes in to ask them to take care of a hernia. a gorilla suit looks the same no matter what.

By: shovethenos

shovethenos — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:07:11 +0000

If it was a costume it still looks like the did the photoshop fill thing too, because there is no detail within the outlines of any of the figures. (other than the brush superimposed in the one picture)

By: Xeno2814

Xeno2814 — Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:09:47 +0000

My vote is that Hans apparently bought the costume from a local store called George and Company two weeks ago, even though he continues to deny it. Apparently the store owner even identifed a picture of Hans as the individual who bought a $125 gorilla costume when a local news station investigated. Naturally, this prompted a flurry of other ‘bigfoot’ photos that were…painful to look at. I never knew female Sasquatch came in neon pink…

By: traveler

traveler — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 01:35:03 +0000

my vote is its a blurry deer head…..whos wit me?

By: shovethenos

shovethenos — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 13:02:30 +0000

Chymo-

If it’s not a photoshop creation why aren’t there any details within the outline of the figure other than the tractor and weed superimposed over the figure?

There’s no detail within the outline of the figure in any of the pictures, including the last one, where you should be able to make out detail on the left arm, which is facing the camera and closer than the rest of the figure. This tends to indicate that this is a photoshop hoax - these clowns were too cheap to even rent a decent ape or wookie suit.

By: DWA

DWA — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 05:52:59 +0000

Cool. Tell MTV da maxpied is ready for his closeup!

Someone in the previous thread on this topic asked, if it’s real why did he get only one lousy photo? These aren’t lousy, which is one clue that they’re fake, right there. These are pretty clear pix of a guy in an ape suit, and a John Deere model rendered in more than enough detail for me to approximate a sale price.

NO ONE who didn’t go into the woods with a clear intent to get a shot of a sas will get anything close to one clear one. Same with foxes, wolves and mink. (Deer? Anyone can get a shot of a deer. Um, sometimes heh heh. They’re tame, ferpetesake.) Wildlife photogs don’t grabshoot; they wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and let me know when you get bored and keep waiting….

Why P/G got a good film of a sas was:

1. They spent the time in the country, looking for one.

2. They were on horseback. (It’s known that animals aren’t as spooky when you’re on a horse.)

3. They were lucky enough — and prepared enough — to catch one in the open.

And they still got one of the most maddeningly brief films on record.

With a truly wild animal, you only get one shot. That is, if you wait for it.

By: Mnynames

Mnynames — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 04:59:31 +0000

I like the P/G pose from shot #2…either that, or he IS walking like an Egyptian…

By: Stickler

Stickler — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:08:34 +0000

Please………………………Send Bigfoot to my house. I live a few miles from the sighting area in Clarence and I could use the money selling T-shirts,tickets, photos ,posters and any other crap people are willing to spend their money on for stupid stunts such as this. Someone call David Letterman………………………Or maybe Howard Stern

By: chrisandclauida2

chrisandclauida2 — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 07:28:00 +0000

looks like one of those card board cut outs the set up so tourests can take pictures with. only the computer mixed harry and the hendersons bigfoot with elvis

By: Chymo

Chymo — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 07:19:27 +0000

There is *no* photoshopping in these pix.

The creature shown is a *real* guy in a suit, this is directed @ Jeremy Wells & those who still think something has been ‘blacked out’ in the pictures.

The lack of detail you are seeing is a low-fidelity image/contrast issue, nothing more.