http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/ for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:02:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14345 Benjamin Radford Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:48:43 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14345 I thought the Lake Monsters show was pretty good, myself. It shows how skeptical and, well, less skeptical researchers can work together... I think cryptozoology would benefit greatly from three things: 1) engaging in more debate and less name-calling; 2) double-checking sources; and 3) actually reading arguments on all sides of the issue. I thought the Lake Monsters show was pretty good, myself. It shows how skeptical and, well, less skeptical researchers can work together… I think cryptozoology would benefit greatly from three things: 1) engaging in more debate and less name-calling; 2) double-checking sources; and 3) actually reading arguments on all sides of the issue.

]]> http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14344 WillyVolk Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:54:59 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14344 I really enjoyed the "lake monsters" show and posted a <a href="http://www.divester.com/2005/08/04/is-it-real-reviewed/">review of it on Divester</a>. I really enjoyed the “lake monsters” show and posted a review of it on Divester.

]]> http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14343 byondbyond Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:38:48 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14343 i like the "is it real" shows - far better than most shows out there - though i do agree the bigfoot episode was pretty biased to the skeptical. monster of the deep was very good. i like the “is it real” shows - far better than most shows out there - though i do agree the bigfoot episode was pretty biased to the skeptical. monster of the deep was very good.

]]> http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14342 Loren Coleman Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:06:21 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14342 Scott Corrales, a Hispanic Chupacabras investigator based in the USA, is definitely one of the most overlooked authorities on the subject. He, btw, says that media folks who use "Chupacabra" are incorrectly using a singular form that does not exist. He says that the plural/singular usage is the same - "Chupacabras." Scott Corrales, a Hispanic Chupacabras investigator based in the USA, is definitely one of the most overlooked authorities on the subject. He, btw, says that media folks who use “Chupacabra” are incorrectly using a singular form that does not exist. He says that the plural/singular usage is the same - “Chupacabras.”

]]> http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14341 Joe Biello Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:20:32 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/monsters-of-the-deep-on-national-geographic-channel/#comment-14341 Saw the Chupacabra episode. They of course totally dismiss it as overactive imaginations. They also explained away animal mutilations in this episode also. They didn't even think of contacting Linda Moulton Howe for any response for the mutilation part. She is only one of the foremost experts in the field. Nat Geo must be on the governments disinformation campaign! Saw the Chupacabra episode. They of course totally dismiss it as overactive imaginations. They also explained away animal mutilations in this episode also. They didn’t even think of contacting Linda Moulton Howe for any response for the mutilation part. She is only one of the foremost experts in the field. Nat Geo must be on the governments disinformation campaign!

]]>