Guys…. think about this for a sec.

We’re on the internet…. look to the right… look at the google ads on the site.

Suppose there were 2 identical ads… both saying “Make $5000 a week using the internet from home.”

one had a screenshot of the guy holding a check you can clearly see…

the other had nothing.

Which one would you click?

gotta say, I applaud them and respect them for actually getting off their rear ends and following their dreams and doing something. So as much trash as I talk about them, its just because i feel like they could be doing so much better and want to see them do better.

Never seen you on this post board before so lets get your thoughts on the below “evidence” you are challenging. Take the time to look into each one as they are fascinating.

1. Cripplefoot Cast
2. Jimmy Chilcutt analysis of casts.
3. Sierra Nevada sounds / Snohomish howl (spent my share of time in woods, I can’t ID it…can you ?)
4. Patterson Gimlin (if fake why can’t they replicate it?)
5. Over 3,000 reported sightings in modern era in USA by park rangers, former police officers, etc. (bfro has decent database) Why are people seeing the same thing year after year and not unicorns, dragons, or elves in woods? Is a big smelly ape that exciting to make up as a story? And why also would French Soldiers during the French and Indian war talk about the “hairy men” in the woods? There are also accounts by Teddy Roosevelt (ie Wilderness Hunter in case you want to check my source) and Samuel De Champlain of unkown giant hairy men who inhabit the woods. So it’s all BS?

In the absence of proof, all I ask for is that they follow what appears to be evidence.

From my scan of the list, these don’t appear to be places that just “look squatchy,” but places where activity is going on that hey, just might be.

If you don’t follow possibilities, you don’t get proof. (Or have any fun. Which, when science is doing what science should, it happens to be.)

but to me, people are making statements they believe to be true without any supporting facts, proof or evidence to support their claim.

to me, until they provide proof, thats all these things are, claims.

Without facts, proof and evidence to support a claim, who’s to believe it?

Would a court?

Would a jury?

Would science?

Lets be real here… Its not like we’re talking about making money in the stock market… and we want proof that you’re really making 40% ROI on your money.

these people are saying there IS an animal that is not “supposed” to exist… a new animal…. this is an extraordinary claim…

with that in mind, you need the same level of proof.

Loren love the work you do…. i’m truly fascinated by it…. like i said before, i realize i sound like the biggest skeptic, i just find the level of proof within the ‘bigfoot community’ from what little I’ve seen severely lacking and the level of imagination running rampant.

okay… show me the evidence that leads you and him to believe so.

if theres no proof to justify this, case closed.

so if there is bigfoots there… surely they would have evidence of this….

its like saying there’s aliens and ufo’s there, but you have no proof.

who is going to believe you without proof?