The video that he is analyzing seems interesting, but his voice overlayment is distracting and the viewer just tends to see what he is describing, instead of seeing what is actually there on the video.

What he has done is created an active memory bias, where you will interpret what you see through his interpretation, it will not be based on the actual recorded event.

To be unbiased he should have let the video run through once, without interpretation, then he could have added his viewpoints.

This is not the first time, nor likely the last time, that he will make up context that is different from content.

By the way, I grow my own herbs, vegetables, etc. So taking a shot at a farmer would be taking a shot at myself. Also, just remember when reading posts, you have to look for the central theme, which is the narrator is a joke. What he says is a joke. I was taking shots at what he said and what he said about the farmer. Read a little more carefully next time.

In addition, where did I imply that the farmer were backwater rednecks? I never used that term and certainly did not imply that thought. Where did you come up with that notion? You seem a little too defensive. I say that because when anyone has to predicate their post by describing what degrees they have, that’s a red flag for an inferiority complex. I probably have the same degrees you possess and maybe more. However, you don’t see me posting that information to make my post sound more important than it is.

Anyway, glad you agree with me on the narrator. Please don’t take generalized public posts to heart. And if you read more into my post that was meant, I am sorry for you doing that and becoming subsequently offended. My post was not intended to offend you. Maybe try reading it again before being so defensive and accusatory.

On a side note, I am a redneck and proud of it. I’m got some Skoal Cherry in my lip right now as I am typing. I am going to the State Fair tomorrow after picking some tomatoes off the vine and some fresh basil growing in my garden. I am going fishing next week! Being a backwater redneck is not a bad thing. I am proud of it. And notice, I am not offended by you posting about my fellow rednecks. I guess an implied insult to some is a complement to others.

See you around Cryptomundo!

I have a friend who joins a local group of “Ghosthunters” here in Maine. They post videos on Facebook. They fall into this same type of scrutiny where they act like they are doing real science but no one has any training. No controls are used. Their opinions are biased/slanted. They have their own lingo. They stay up all night catching some far off noise. Instead of proof they come across very comically. It’s kind of like Mall Security guards acting like cops. They talk the lingo but in the end they are just Mall Guards with no real training. And we laugh at them in the food court when they chase the 15 year old kid who stole the PS3 game from Gamestop. They are hyped up on adrenaline, over excited. They turn over the kid to the real cops. They exchange lingo laced small talk. But instead of using the word “Squatch” or in the Ghost world “Geist” they use the word “Perp”. The real cops leave while joking with one another about the Mall Guards being wannabes!

It is strange how all of those worlds are very similar. But all are fun to watch!

While I agree this bit of video is worthless when it comes to proving anything I have to point out a few things in your post. You seem to be confusing what the FB/BF analyzer is saying with what the Farmer reported. And also, the stereotype of farmers as backwater rednecks is both insulting and inaccurate. You also seem to assume that the farmer is a old man who barely functions above a luddite level. Granted that article using terms like ‘newfanggled’ doesn’t help but that’s cheap journalism in my eyes.

I consider myself a farmer/homesteader. I have multiple degrees, use technology on a daily basis; not only to run my consulting business but to keep track of expenses, stay in contact with family and friends, track how well different strains of tomatoes, peas, beans, melons are performing (heirloom seeds), lineage of my animals, banking/bill paying and of course to surf the web. I and every member of my family (including my parents & Grans) has and uses cell phones on a daily basis. In fact if you live outside of a city I think you are MORE likely to know how to do these things for the sake of saving time/money/fuel.

Perhaps if the couple were in their 70′s or older I could agree with your views but most farmers in their 70′s aren’t actively farming, at least not without a lot of physical help.

@ everyone

FB/BF serves a purpose, and they do a lot of grunt work when it comes to analyzing clips and such, but I feel they do tend to accept a few things as given when we have no proof at all. I put it down to enthusiasm, but it’s something we need to be aware of. The analyst seems to be seeing things that are merely artifacts in the video clip, or at least could be merely artifacts. I will be the first to admit that this is not my forte. Also, it doesn’t seem to be moving ‘that’ quickly, I’ve seen my 14yo move faster than that while chasing an animal through underbrush. Granted, he could have passed for an animal himself when he got back to the yard, but if you’re in good physical shape and determined/focused, the speed shown on this video does not come close to exceptional.

Look, I want to believe too, but I don’t buy every video I see. And breathlessly “analyzing” every one of them like its the real thing isn’t adding to anyone’s credibility.

As for this video, it looks like a guy in a suit. What proportions we can see look all too human. Next.

Now look at the video after a couple of seconds of walking not seeing a thing the supposed “Squatch” starts off from a crouched stationary position and “runs”. Jumping any animal then reacting and pulling out a device to film it takes time. The video contradicts the story.

Then it is mentioned how “fast” this “creature” is. Take another look at the way the thing “runs”. It’s like watching Roddy McDowell get around in a Planet of the Apes movie. The “Planet of the Apes” sway it has is so obvious that it is just scampering along very a bolt to get away!

I’m calling it…………………..HOAX!!

Not that Bigfoot really exists anyway!