Comments on: Matt Moneymaker Confirms the “Sobe Bomb Bigfoot” is a Real Sasquatch

By: ajakana89

ajakana89 — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:35:17 +0000

There are too many problems i find with this video, and anybody trying to search for a sasquatch.

#1 to the people asking why every single picture or video is blurry it is because,they are using a camera with very low megapixels. example: if you have a camera phone with 1.0 or 1.3 mp then no matter how far or how close you are the photo will be blurry, if you have a camera phone with 5 mp then pictures come out clear and better, even more better in daytime. As for videos it is mainly the same thing, not only that you can put the settings to where a picture wont come out good,what i mean by that is you can change the background color, the lighting, crop and edit pics or videos,write on them etc…

#2 These people are insane to think that they can capture a big foot on tape for 1 reason and 1 reason only. That reason is obvious and simple,these people must not care about staying alive because if you ask me all the stories, and descriptions people have given all say the same thing which is that bigfoot is very aggressive and strong. So i can not understand why in the hell would these people think they are not going to get their heads ripped off their shoulders in a split second, they don’t know a damn thing about bigfoot, what it eats, behavior, the maximum height, weight, where exactly it hides out/lives all the above.

#3 I have a major problem with the way they make the howls and calls of a bigfoot, how do they know what sound it makes? i believe that their are creatures out here that are unknown and should remain unknown. I don’t see how this is a job for these people and how they can even sit there and laugh like bigfoot is going to give them the privilege or be nice to them. In the above video mentioned also a major problem i find.

How the hell can they zoom in on the fire and you can clearly see it, but when this so called bigfoot walks by they couldn’t zoom in?, if it was bigfoot there is absolutely no way that it would just walk past them. The creature would have walked or ran towards them to bust their asses,and probably would kill them. So I agree with everyone else that this is just a person walking slowly,again there probably is some weird s*** that no one knows about, but they need to be left alone and unbothered before something bad happens.

By: Atkin Co Sasquatch

Atkin Co Sasquatch — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:35:03 +0000

After seeing how Matt Moneymaker conducts himself on the show FB, I have lost all respect for him a a researcher. He and his crew have made outrageous claims that the evidence is ” definitely a squatch ” When its clearly not ! Evidence needs to be conclusive and undeniable period. The only person on that show that has any common sense is Renae.

By: terry the censor

terry the censor — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:05:55 +0000

Thanks Drew. A little fact-checking often beats explanations.

By: LordBalto

LordBalto — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:41:28 +0000

“I definitely believe this is a Blobsquatch.
It has all the classic Blobsquatch characteristics.
And, it LOOKS like a Blobsquatch.
And, behaves like one.”

Yeah, but does it quack like a blobsquatch?

By: hoosierhunter2

hoosierhunter2 — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:37:13 +0000

The name “Moneymaker” should be a clue!

By: dingdong

dingdong — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:04:41 +0000

Mr. Moneymaker’s “programs” are an embarrassment to the field of cryptological research. The entirely un-necessary, amateurish narration– does he actually read the script in advance?— coupled with the ludicrous, over the top conclusion isn’t helping anything. Another waste of time.

By: mike_noodles

mike_noodles — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:21:54 +0000

That’s funny, I said that before seeing the high res one, you can see the kid a couple of times when the camera goes to the extreme left, lol. But maybe he wasn’t wearing a jacket, he’s there to the left though watching the fire.

By: DNS

DNS — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:53:44 +0000

At the very least, this was a neat test of MM’s powers of interpretation. We can only hope he learns from it. If nothing else, he needs to qualify his remarks the way any professional does when dealing with multiple variables and questionable evidence. Pretty basic stuff, really.

By: Opalman

Opalman — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:50:40 +0000

Yes; this clearer video clearly shows a skinny human wearing what appears to be a vee neck tee shirt. I wonder if MM viewed this clearer, higher res video? If he did…then double shame, shame on him.

By: flightsuit

flightsuit — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:20:35 +0000

Wow, that is so obviously, unequivocally a person in that video. I’d never heard of Matt Moneymaker prior to seeing this Cryptomundo update, and I still have no idea who he is, but whoever the heck he is, I hope he’ll be issuing a public apology for saying silly stuff that could harm the credibility of the cryptozoological community.