My problem is that from the beginning every earmark of oh-brother has been in place on this one. Too much crowing; too many asides; too many missteps, backsteps and sidesteps..and we still do not have any idea where these samples came from.

And if it isn’t that big guy, over there on that slab, go have a look, look like a guy in a suit to you…?

…Well, we don’t have bigfoot yet, whatever the DNA says.

The first I heard of Ketchum I mentally filed it under “sideshow.” It had all the markers and I haven’t been disappointed.

I think Melba ketchums research isnt finished yet! She still has samples, some of which (imo) will contain sasquatch DNA and among the three she checked for NuDNA will be encapsulated relevant imformation from which advances can be made in defining Sasquatch in terms of DNA. I assume every sample collected will contain some contaminent of human DNA. Though within hair at least the DNA though likely to be in short supply, can be well protected within its chitin sheath and can be properly washed clean of contaminents.

Clearly Dr ketchum undertook something very difficult but has been able to be a contender unlike mainstream science lead by Todd Disotell who has uncovered very little except Ursus Americanus himself !

Dr Sykes is now two months overdue with his results and this may indicate how difficult a task it is to sort out the Saquatch DNA.

What Dr Ketchum really needed was to belong to an organisation as does Svante Saabo at Leipzig uni ! She is making a similar if not greater undertaking without what appears to be neccessary full support

If she had she might be getting one of these.

While I tend to agree that Bigfoot is real, Dr. Ketchum’s insistence that Bigfoot are people puts her research in a questionable light. Maybe she should visit the Carter Farm.

Or to be more precise, per her embedded video and latest genetic/morphological/paleoanthropological description – they are THESE particular type of people – non-human-people-lemurs that look just like Chewbacca.