Comments on: Kentucky Bigfoot Video Lawsuit: The Aftermath

By: Ole Bub

Ole Bub — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:32:29 +0000

Good morning Cryptos….

The only phenomena stranger than sasquatch are the politics of sasquatchery…JMHO

What a waste of time and money…no bucks…no bigfoot.

It’s about them not us…JMHO

live and let live…

ole bub and the dawgs

By: scotto

scotto — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:39:20 +0000

I’m glad this has been resolved, Craig.

I can’t believe anyone would pay $40 bucks for that crappy film, let alone $40,000. Good grief.

By: The_Carrot

The_Carrot — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:47:26 +0000

Who would have thought that all we’d need to do in order to prove the existence of Sasquatch is lay out a pile of pancakes?

Expensive pancakes, apparently…

Yeesh.

By: green lantern

green lantern — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:35:47 +0000

Same old story. Too many chiefs, not enough braves. Clash of egos amongst the experts.

By: Patrick Bede

Patrick Bede — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:34:18 +0000

I saw where the quote was provided by Woolheater from some obscure individual named “Jim Flowers” (ah what a sweet name) on that obscure message board. I’m not sure why anything that guy says, whoever he is, even matters. I saw there that several of the posters seem to be taunting Woolheater to post on their board. WTF? I wouldn’t waste my time. From spending just a little time reading on that forum, it seems those guys are self-appointed know-it-alls & they love to argue allot & provoke. Whoever they are, they must feel empowered by their ability to post on a forum, hiding behind hundreds of miles, with no consequences. Anyway, they’re insignificant & who cares what some one named “Flowers” thinks anyway. Besides, after reading Woolheater’s writings, I am not sure how having to pay big bucks to a high-powered attorney results in “free” publicity, anyway. I bet both sides spent a bunch of money settling this deal.

This is just another case of some blowhard like this Jim Flowers character trying to blow himself up to be bigger than he is by commenting on something that he knows nothing about. This is par for the course for most of these bigfoot forums.

By: DWA

DWA — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:49:15 +0000

The only comment I could possibly see fit to give on this tawdry crap:

Incompetence on the part of the searchers is not evidence against the sasquatch.

Moneymaker [sigh] …he had such a future once….

[OK, that's two comments.]

By: Teresa Hall

Teresa Hall — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:03:12 +0000

Wow, $20,0000 dollars was paid by Adrian Erickson over and above the $20,000 that Matt Moneymaker was paid to buy the video equipment to film the pancake eater? I hope the original high resolution video was better than the footage I saw!

Nice job getting this news out to the public. Another black eye for the BFRO. tsk tsk.

By: Kathy Strain

Kathy Strain — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:42:31 +0000

Craig – that is good news! I’m glad to hear that this has been resolved.

Kathy

By: joppa

joppa — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:43:04 +0000

Somebody missed their calling in life. Anyone who can sell a bigfoot eating pancakes for $40,000.00 could sell sand to the Saudis.

Anyone interested in a tape of a Yeti yodeling? How about an Almasty acting all nasty? I won’t even sue if you post it on Cryptomundo.

By: wildmanmarty

wildmanmarty — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:41:59 +0000

This incident changes my viewpoint of the BFRO. How many people have actually jumped ship from that organization, I wonder?