Comments on: New Klamath River Bigfoot Video

By: Lyndon

Lyndon — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:44:19 +0000

“C’mon Hoaxers! You gotta do better than that!”

Time and time again, they prove that they can’t. You’d think there would have been a good ‘hoax’ perpetrated by now. But there still isn’t one.

By: apebait

apebait — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:31:03 +0000

I knew it was Oliver the second I saw it. C’mon Hoaxers! You gotta do better than that! Sheesh!

By: Holmes

Holmes — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:43:41 +0000

Do those cameras have automatic zoom capability?

By: Digger44

Digger44 — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:08:13 +0000

I find it so hilarious that so many of you are adamant that this is a suit and a hoax when it is a proven chimpanzee. And you wonder why there are so many skeptics against bigfoot believers? So many people have crowned themselves experts of analysis when you actually do not have a clue.

Thanks to Loren for always being level headed and letting the facts speak for themselves instead of making foolish conclusions based upon some doll eye, facial expressions, mouth, and lips that are all from a suit, but are actually a live chimpanzee.

The truth is that if we actually got an authentic bigfoot video, most couldn’t tell it from their elbow.

By: cryptozoologyshop

cryptozoologyshop — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:22:20 +0000

Comments on youtube suggest that this is an excerpt from a film of Oliver the chimp.

By: Maine Crypto

Maine Crypto — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:07:27 +0000

This looks very much like a mountain gorilla to me…. I am interested to hear more.

By: Ole Bub

Ole Bub — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:05:23 +0000

Sorry folks…it’s looks like a hoax to my old beady eyes…no facial feature movement, or blinking….you’d think they would close their mouth when the camera is rolling…where is squatch etiquette when ya need it….LOL

live and let live…

ole bub and the dawgs

By: twiley

twiley — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:34:13 +0000

This is my first post on this blog. This video got me to post. I am not a skeptic. I am however skeptical of this video.

The eyes (from what I can see) do not blink. Maybe someone can find a frame where the subject blinks? The mouth never moves. The mouth appears to move but the camera is moving which makes it appear the mouth moves. Also the ground does looked raked as Kimble mentioned. What would cause that? I also noticed something on the subject’s right leg. A blade of grass/stick?

Also what is on the subjects left waist? Bald spot or more grass/stick?

I can not see any muscle movement on the subjects face. The head portion appears to be lighter colored hair/fur/mask then the body portion (Is that normal for primates?). Hard to conclude anything for only being able to see 9 seconds of video…

By: Craig Woolheater

Craig Woolheater — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:13:58 +0000

Two Cryptomundo readers have already ferreted out the truth behind this video. See Update: New Klamath River Bigfoot Video for the real story here.

By: fallofrain

fallofrain — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:09:37 +0000

The area around the Klamath River on the Oregon-Washington border is semi-arid. There are generally only two types of tree there that you could put a trailcam on…live oak or ponderosa pine. The pine would be the better choice for a vertical shot. But I don’t see leaf or needle/pinecone litter on the ground at all. In those types of forest there’s tree litter everywhere. It’s one reason we get such monster fires. Maybe the photographer DID pack in a rake to clear the space for a shot…but why?