<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Calling Bigfoot: Will He Answer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjolnir1964</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72294</link>
		<dc:creator>mjolnir1964</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sasquatch vocalizations have always interested me. I remember as a kid watching &quot;Mysterious Monsters&quot; with Peter Graves back in the 70&#039;s.  I remember in the film, some recordings of vocalizations were played, and those recordings sounded NOTHING like the sounds used today. Have those old recordings been explained or ruled as a hoax? I cannot remember the names of those involved, but they were in the movie. Anyone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasquatch vocalizations have always interested me. I remember as a kid watching &#8220;Mysterious Monsters&#8221; with Peter Graves back in the 70&#8242;s.  I remember in the film, some recordings of vocalizations were played, and those recordings sounded NOTHING like the sounds used today. Have those old recordings been explained or ruled as a hoax? I cannot remember the names of those involved, but they were in the movie. Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72225</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m of two minds on call-blasting.

1.  Who knows what you&#039;re blasting?  Plus, you may be introducing counterproductive &quot;noise&quot; (in much the same way as our artificial lights screw up the star maps of moths and other insects).  In the former case, numbers at least appear to be so few that one might not want to do this.

2.  Then again, sometimes you do get a response.  I&#039;ve read more than one TBRC account that describes what certainly seems to have been a response to a call blast.

I&#039;ve imitated ravens&#039; calls on numerous occasions.  I think I&#039;m pretty good; but I also think I&#039;m no raven, and that they can hear that.  Almost every time I do it, though, I get what clearly seems to be a response; the bird (frequently plural) not only comes back vocally, and repeatedly, but intently circles my position, invariably coming closer to me, almost undoubtedly to identify the clown because not too many of those people critters do this.

Until clear negative ramifications of doing this can be identified, though, not sure I can be against it (I mean, after all, I&#039;m doing it too, right?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of two minds on call-blasting.</p>
<p>1.  Who knows what you&#8217;re blasting?  Plus, you may be introducing counterproductive &#8220;noise&#8221; (in much the same way as our artificial lights screw up the star maps of moths and other insects).  In the former case, numbers at least appear to be so few that one might not want to do this.</p>
<p>2.  Then again, sometimes you do get a response.  I&#8217;ve read more than one TBRC account that describes what certainly seems to have been a response to a call blast.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve imitated ravens&#8217; calls on numerous occasions.  I think I&#8217;m pretty good; but I also think I&#8217;m no raven, and that they can hear that.  Almost every time I do it, though, I get what clearly seems to be a response; the bird (frequently plural) not only comes back vocally, and repeatedly, but intently circles my position, invariably coming closer to me, almost undoubtedly to identify the clown because not too many of those people critters do this.</p>
<p>Until clear negative ramifications of doing this can be identified, though, not sure I can be against it (I mean, after all, I&#8217;m doing it too, right?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nominay</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72203</link>
		<dc:creator>Nominay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect the same as sasquatch and wolfatrest. My uninformed opinion has always told me that call blasting is stupid. It just strikes me as pointless and arrogant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the same as sasquatch and wolfatrest. My uninformed opinion has always told me that call blasting is stupid. It just strikes me as pointless and arrogant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peteyweestro</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72200</link>
		<dc:creator>peteyweestro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree that I haven&#039;t read many reports where it seems like &quot;call blasting&quot; was a smashing success, but playing a recording of children playing or even babies crying seems like it could work really well. Then you might play sounds of females talking and see then if you get any results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree that I haven&#8217;t read many reports where it seems like &#8220;call blasting&#8221; was a smashing success, but playing a recording of children playing or even babies crying seems like it could work really well. Then you might play sounds of females talking and see then if you get any results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Strain</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72199</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just got back from an expedition.  Call blasting was the heart of it and we would not have gotten what we did without it (no bodies or DNA - to quell any rumors). I don&#039;t know in particular what Nominay is referring to, but we have come across quite a bit with our work.  There is no disappointment at all.

The call blasts we use have a signature &quot;added&quot; sound that ensures that other humans hearing it will know it&#039;s a recording vs. live.  I have no fear in my remote area that &quot;other&quot; bigfooters are operating/call blasting without my knowledge.

I think what should be emphasized is that researchers are free to pick and choose their own methods.  What works for them may not work for someone else. If you think something new will work, you should try it.  We have tried children laughing and cooking smells (along with many, many other things). Call blasting has been one of the few consistent methods that we feel produces results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just got back from an expedition.  Call blasting was the heart of it and we would not have gotten what we did without it (no bodies or DNA &#8211; to quell any rumors). I don&#8217;t know in particular what Nominay is referring to, but we have come across quite a bit with our work.  There is no disappointment at all.</p>
<p>The call blasts we use have a signature &#8220;added&#8221; sound that ensures that other humans hearing it will know it&#8217;s a recording vs. live.  I have no fear in my remote area that &#8220;other&#8221; bigfooters are operating/call blasting without my knowledge.</p>
<p>I think what should be emphasized is that researchers are free to pick and choose their own methods.  What works for them may not work for someone else. If you think something new will work, you should try it.  We have tried children laughing and cooking smells (along with many, many other things). Call blasting has been one of the few consistent methods that we feel produces results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfatrest</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72187</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfatrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Sasquatch, I don&#039;t consider hearing something in the woods that &quot;might&quot; be a bigfoot coming closer to be an actual encounter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sasquatch, I don&#8217;t consider hearing something in the woods that &#8220;might&#8221; be a bigfoot coming closer to be an actual encounter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasquatch</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72178</link>
		<dc:creator>sasquatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah Fuzzy, If you read my post again you&#039;ll see that I said; I know of NO report where call blasting led to a SIGHTING...You can imagine that a bigfoot is just inside the tree line after call blasting or wood knocking or whatever racket you want to make, but unless you see it, it&#039;s all theory/wishful thinking. Some of the other posters seem to understand that this could be counter-productive and have come to similar doubts about this technique. I too wonder if sometimes Bigfoot call blasters get responses from others doing the same thing. Wouldn&#039;t it be funny if Sasquatch was somewhere between all these noisy humans and their bad impressions laughing his butt off?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Fuzzy, If you read my post again you&#8217;ll see that I said; I know of NO report where call blasting led to a SIGHTING&#8230;You can imagine that a bigfoot is just inside the tree line after call blasting or wood knocking or whatever racket you want to make, but unless you see it, it&#8217;s all theory/wishful thinking. Some of the other posters seem to understand that this could be counter-productive and have come to similar doubts about this technique. I too wonder if sometimes Bigfoot call blasters get responses from others doing the same thing. Wouldn&#8217;t it be funny if Sasquatch was somewhere between all these noisy humans and their bad impressions laughing his butt off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crypto_Don</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72176</link>
		<dc:creator>Crypto_Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do people call blasting know that they aren&#039;t hearing another group call blasting.  Especially in areas the the PNW, where BF hunting seems to be more common, two individual groups could be screaming at each other and not know it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do people call blasting know that they aren&#8217;t hearing another group call blasting.  Especially in areas the the PNW, where BF hunting seems to be more common, two individual groups could be screaming at each other and not know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzy</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72171</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see Kathy and Bob are still actively at it... 

Re: &quot;sasquatch&quot; comment above - &quot;...and can’t recall if I’ve EVER read even one where people were out call blasting and a Sasquatch came into sight&quot; - there are several reports of distant responding howls getting closer and closer and then stopping - so how are we to know if other curious Bigfoots respond silently, then lurk, just out of view, watching?

Creatures have been startled from hiding when fisherfolk or families or partyers have unexpectedly stepped into the woods to relieve themselves or gather firewood, and we know Bigfoots can move around soundlessly, so it doesn&#039;t invalidate call-blasting.

I would scan the location&#039;s periphery with Gen 3 Nite Vision, Thermal and audio gear, call blast, continue scanning, wait until all the echoes die away, scan and blast again, wait longer, scan and blast etc... wait, what&#039;s that heat blob moving at the edge of the woods? It&#039;s getting larger - IT&#039;S COMING THIS WAY! 

Quick! Where&#039;s my camcorder?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see Kathy and Bob are still actively at it&#8230; </p>
<p>Re: &#8220;sasquatch&#8221; comment above &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;and can’t recall if I’ve EVER read even one where people were out call blasting and a Sasquatch came into sight&#8221; &#8211; there are several reports of distant responding howls getting closer and closer and then stopping &#8211; so how are we to know if other curious Bigfoots respond silently, then lurk, just out of view, watching?</p>
<p>Creatures have been startled from hiding when fisherfolk or families or partyers have unexpectedly stepped into the woods to relieve themselves or gather firewood, and we know Bigfoots can move around soundlessly, so it doesn&#8217;t invalidate call-blasting.</p>
<p>I would scan the location&#8217;s periphery with Gen 3 Nite Vision, Thermal and audio gear, call blast, continue scanning, wait until all the echoes die away, scan and blast again, wait longer, scan and blast etc&#8230; wait, what&#8217;s that heat blob moving at the edge of the woods? It&#8217;s getting larger &#8211; IT&#8217;S COMING THIS WAY! </p>
<p>Quick! Where&#8217;s my camcorder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfatrest</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/kathy-strain-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72156</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfatrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=44761#comment-72156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My problem with call blasting is that you have no idea what you&#039;re blasting.  You may be blasting a call that means &quot;Stay away, those stinky humans are in the area yet again&quot;.  I would think a sasquatch would be intelligent enough to know the difference between a real call and one broadcast through speakers.  It seems to me that most encounters have been accidental and announcing your presence this way would be counter-productive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with call blasting is that you have no idea what you&#8217;re blasting.  You may be blasting a call that means &#8220;Stay away, those stinky humans are in the area yet again&#8221;.  I would think a sasquatch would be intelligent enough to know the difference between a real call and one broadcast through speakers.  It seems to me that most encounters have been accidental and announcing your presence this way would be counter-productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 28/48 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-05-18 06:03:11 by W3 Total Cache -->