<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ivory-billed Woodpecker rediscovered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/ivory-billed-woodpecker-rediscovered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/ivory-billed-woodpecker-rediscovered/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cryptomundo.com &#187; BFRO vs. Cryptomundo</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/ivory-billed-woodpecker-rediscovered/#comment-14152</link>
		<dc:creator>Cryptomundo.com &#187; BFRO vs. Cryptomundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/ivory-billed-woodpecker-rediscovered/#comment-14152</guid>
		<description>[...] Below are the traffic ranking graphs from Alexa.com, comparing the traffic to both sites. Mind you, Cryptomundo went live on September 29th of 2005. That was the date that I posted the very first topic here on Cryptomundo. So we are talking about a site that has been online a few days longer than nine months. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Below are the traffic ranking graphs from Alexa.com, comparing the traffic to both sites. Mind you, Cryptomundo went live on September 29th of 2005. That was the date that I posted the very first topic here on Cryptomundo. So we are talking about a site that has been online a few days longer than nine months. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
