Comments on: Comments regarding the identity of a hand of unknown origin http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/ for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:26:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: oldbutnotstupid http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/#comment-16856 oldbutnotstupid Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:17:28 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/comments-regarding-the-identity-of-a-hand-of-unknown-origin/#comment-16856 I am so sick of all this fake evidence an phoney bigfoot investagators who are nothing more then American con-artists/want-a-be writers. The bigfoot,if it exists is obviously more intelligent then those who seek to find it, and with these idiots that is not saying a lot. I for one will not follow this subject any more. It is a waste of time. I am so sick of all this fake evidence an phoney bigfoot investagators who are nothing more then American con-artists/want-a-be writers. The bigfoot,if it exists is obviously more intelligent then those who seek to find it, and with these idiots that is not saying a lot. I for one will not follow this subject any more. It is a waste of time.

]]> By: Alton Higgins http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/#comment-16855 Alton Higgins Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:28:36 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/comments-regarding-the-identity-of-a-hand-of-unknown-origin/#comment-16855 This wasn't intended to be a surprise. I stated on 12 July that it was a bear foot and that I was sending Craig a picture, which ended up being several pictures. See Comment #8 at the <a href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/dna-results/">DNA results post</a>. Craig asked me to write something up to summarize the pictures, which I did last Friday, the piece you see here. This wasn’t intended to be a surprise. I stated on 12 July that it was a bear foot and that I was sending Craig a picture, which ended up being several pictures. See Comment #8 at the DNA results post.

Craig asked me to write something up to summarize the pictures, which I did last Friday, the piece you see here.

]]> By: cor2879 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/#comment-16854 cor2879 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:49:04 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/comments-regarding-the-identity-of-a-hand-of-unknown-origin/#comment-16854 No surprise here. After the original post that showed an X-ray of the hand and the skeletal remains of a bear paw it was pretty clear what this was. No surprise here. After the original post that showed an X-ray of the hand and the skeletal remains of a bear paw it was pretty clear what this was.

]]> By: Jeremy_Wells http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/#comment-16853 Jeremy_Wells Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:02:27 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/comments-regarding-the-identity-of-a-hand-of-unknown-origin/#comment-16853 I've said for a while "taxidermy cast off". I stick by that hypothesis. I’ve said for a while “taxidermy cast off”. I stick by that hypothesis.

]]> By: fredfacker http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/#comment-16852 fredfacker Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:32:33 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/comments-regarding-the-identity-of-a-hand-of-unknown-origin/#comment-16852 If you read back through the previous posts, the DNA lab verified that they were not able to find any testable DNA due to the degraded state of the samples. If you read back through the previous posts, the DNA lab verified that they were not able to find any testable DNA due to the degraded state of the samples.

]]> By: shumway10973 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/hand-comp2/#comment-16851 shumway10973 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:06:32 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoology/comments-regarding-the-identity-of-a-hand-of-unknown-origin/#comment-16851 I don't remember if the dna test even mentioned the possibility of it being a bear's paw. I don't know how that process works, I mean do they always do a broad comparison, or do they go only for what they are asked to look for? If he only asked if this was a known primate, they would say no if it was a bear paw. I'm getting tired of this guy, even more so than chow and the malaysian big foot. I don’t remember if the dna test even mentioned the possibility of it being a bear’s paw. I don’t know how that process works, I mean do they always do a broad comparison, or do they go only for what they are asked to look for? If he only asked if this was a known primate, they would say no if it was a bear paw. I’m getting tired of this guy, even more so than chow and the malaysian big foot.

]]>