Comments on: Fouke Monster Photo

By: Me...You

Me...You — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:57:26 +0000

ok. im new here. i was searching the fouke monster and i ended up here! so here’s the thing, I am from Fouke. Actually i am from a near microscopic town outside of fouke but i go to school in fouke. so anyways, honestly, i never really realized that the fouke monster was so widely known. i find that interesting. but it is my personal opinion that it is all a hoax. the reason i say this is one) fouke is a boring town, i would not be surprised if someone got bored, made themselves a monkey costume, and tried to become a legend. two) the thing hasnt been seen in over 30 years. this would only be conclusive if the person that was impersonating the monster either got bored or unfortunately passed away. here, too, is my opinion though: i dont really care if the thing is fake. He gives our town something to be known for (even if it is obsurd). It gives us something to laugh about orselves for!

By: TNSwampApe

TNSwampApe — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:20:31 +0000

Wouldn’t it be funny if this actually turns out to be a real photograph. I mean, nobody for sure knows what one looks like, and from all the reports 9ft tall yada yada. It’s all about the elements of fear and surprise.

For example, last week a corn snake dropped out of my ceiling rafter. When I caught a glimpse of it coming down, that sucker looked like it was 10 ft plus. Finally, I worked up enough gut to go back in there and it was only 3 feet. Go figure.

By: arktrav

arktrav — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:44:31 +0000

By the way, I’m assuming that the Fouke monster is/was related to the creature in the film, “The Legend of Boggy Creek”. Right?

By: cor2879

cor2879 — Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:00:00 +0000

Looks like a guy decked out in winter gear – heavy winter coat with hood, snow pants and boots. The proportions look more man like than bigfoot-like (using the proportions seen in the Patterson/Gimlin film)

By: talthar

talthar — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:10:34 +0000

The picture is just way too vague to tell anything. Could be Bigfoot, IMHO though, this is a photo of someone in a parka.

By: longrifle48

longrifle48 — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:46:58 +0000

Excellent point from caddo! The pics are always a blob, out of focus. Ole skunker never picks a tourist with a digital camera with a working auto focus and zoom lens. But before shooting one? Make sure it’s not brother jack in his monkey suit!

By: skunkape_hunter

skunkape_hunter — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:31:17 +0000

I agree, nothing Earth shattering there. But I really agree with caddo21, if I knew for sure it were a BF, skunkape,etc.. and I had it in my scope there would be no more unexplained BF sightings !

By: sasquatch

sasquatch — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:42:01 +0000

Couch potatosquatch…..I’ve got broader shoulders than that guy!

By: Ray Soliday

Ray Soliday — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:53:53 +0000

As Miss Swan always says, It look-a, like-a man.

By: ilexoak

ilexoak — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:20 +0000

Doesn’t appear to have that classic linebacker body shape. So many reports tell of shoulders nearly half the animal’s height across. That’s the rule of thumb is use for photos and videos anyway.

Wayne