Where is the professionalism around this show — starting with the initial perceptions???

“Squatch”???

Presenting oneself as “Bobo”, violates everything we know about creating good first impressions in a field where traditional science already views the Bigfoot subject matter with disdain. Surely this gentleman has a given name???

“Ranae” is likely quite pretty under the LL Bean clothing line. But again, how about burning the ear-flap wool caps and showing a little femininity?

“Moneymaker” projects a persona of being a “Money-Maker”; his lack of humility wears on every opinion based upon his expert knowledge, which comes from where??

What a contrast to any special that includes a Meldrum or Coleman interview. Both are cautious in discussing theory vs fact, both are humble presenters who are quick to point out what is and is not evidence, where their theories evolve, and what is still unknown.

I “think” this show could be re-organized to provide the balance between amateur study of Bigfoot science with the acknowledgement surrounding “amateur study”. But start with the basics of initial first impressions and projecting professionalism.

When Renae asked Moneymaker to let her finish and he rolled his eyes I wanted to slap the guy. The others like Bobo are fine but everything is a Squatch to them, you would think that there were more Squatch in the woods then freaking deer. For people who spend a lot of time in the woods they sure jump to conclusions fast.

I also believe most of Moneymaker’s early bigfoot encounters or discoveries like his first prints in Ojai, CA. I grew up in that area and recently have returned and Bigfoot encounters there go back to the 30′s but I think the dude has let the idea of being a Bigfoot hot shot go to his head and forgot why he set out in search of the creature.